>-----Original Message----- >From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Javier Perez > >Hi Everyone >for awhile I've been noticing that when I set my AF >lenses to MF on any of my OESes there is a small range >in terms of barrel turning where the confirm light >stays on. Yet the split image can narrow it down far >more. It's only 2 degrees or so with MF confirm but >far less with the split image. The question is, is MF >more accurate than AF or MF confirm? >Has anyone else observed this?
While I haven't made a real comparison (like a shoot-out) it is my experience that MF gives me more accurate focusing. When I use AF once in a while I often find myself correcting it a tiny little bit. But all this is done with the camera mounted on a tripod. If you shoot action pictures where focus has to be dynamicaly adjusted you are probably better off with using AF, well at leat I would be much better of using AF. Robert * **** ******* *********************************************************** * For list instructions, including unsubscribe, see: * http://www.a1.nl/phomepag/markerink/eos_list.htm ***********************************************************
