--- "Michael J. Shupe" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I did tests with the 300/4 IS and the 300/2.8 IS > between my new 2xII and > my old beat up 2x and the improvement was > significant and easily visible > on D30 test images, though the difference was small. > However, it > probably depends on the lens you are using with it. > > Mike > > > > John Lovda wrote: > > > > This probably was asked already in the past. Has > > anyone done any serious comparison tests to see > how > > significant the improvement (if any) the EF 2X > > Extender version II is over the version I? The > 1.4X > > changes strictly involved gasketing and internal > > anti-reflection flocking. The 2X supposedly has a > new > > optical design. > > > > One interesting thing I noticed is how it is now > > impossible to find a cross-section, optical > diagram of > > the vI model once it was officially discontinued. > > > > John Lovda > > > > -- > Michael Shupe > M.J.Shupe Photography > Michigan Tech University > www.northernlightsgallery.com > * > **** > *******
Hi Michael: I notice on the mail header, that maybe your mail client has a wrong date and time set. It's set to 1906 (were you been born ;-)). Just some OT stuffs. regards, Huang Shao Hui __________________________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? Yahoo! Mail Plus - Powerful. Affordable. Sign up now. http://mailplus.yahoo.com * **** ******* *********************************************************** * For list instructions, including unsubscribe, see: * http://www.a1.nl/phomepag/markerink/eos_list.htm ***********************************************************
