Nelson Ricciardi wrote:
> Hi Steve. > > I also have the Sigma 70-200 2.8 HSM. I fell it a bit too soft at 2.8. > Actually, a little dissapointing. Don�t you fell the same? > > It�s almost useless at 2.8 and only at f4 it�s starts to be ok. At f8 > it�s the same as Canon�s. But at f2.8 one can not compare the > Canon and > the Sigma. > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Nelson, This is not true. I have the Sigma and also had the Canon and ran tests. One of the few times I ever did this. At 30x40 inch projections the Sigma at F2.8 was as good as the Canon and better at 200mm F2.8. Maybe you have Canon envy, but I do not. The Sigma is wonderful and I would put it up against the Canon any time. Major differences, the Canon is more neutral in color rendition, the Sigma slightly warm. The Canon is faster in terms of AF but that's it. Peter K * **** ******* *********************************************************** * For list instructions, including unsubscribe, see: * http://www.a1.nl/phomepag/markerink/eos_list.htm ***********************************************************
