> -----Original Message-----
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Kotsinadelis,
> Peter (Peter)
> Sent: Thursday, January 30, 2003 9:11 AM
> To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
> Subject: RE: EOS Sigma 70-200/2.8 EX HSM
>
>
>
>
> Stephen J. Krogh wrote (edited):
>
>  ...Had I gotten too spoiled by Canons lenses? Who
> wouldn't They are hard to beat, especially the Canon 70-200 2.8 HSM. So I
> decided to get the Sigma from B&H. At least, assuming their rate
> of product
> turn-over, it would have the latest software version that would work with
> the 7, not that I have a 7 but I do want the New EOS TI (what a
> great travel
> body). I was very pleased with this lens' operation, very quiet and smooth
> focusing, no jerking from torque in the focusing. It just makes me wonder,
> how long do I have before mine starts to operate like the demo
> model from my
> LCS. Until then, I couldn't be happier with the overall performance.
> ------------------------------------------------------------------
> ----------
> ---------
> Steve,
>
> For the record, Canon's lenses use USM motors and Sigma uses HSM.
> Sigma HSM equipped lenses DO NOT require an upgrade to work on
> newer EOS bodies.
> Its the Sigma "non-HSM" lenses such as the 28-70mm F2.8 EX
> or the 105mm F2.8 EX Macro.  I own the macro and its been
> upgraded twice. No problems. My HSM is original and works
> fine on all EOS bodies.
> As to your demo lens, was it an HSM? Sigma does have the same
> lens in non-HSM for other bodies.
>
> Peter K
hi Peter,

Sorry for the late reply.  Thanks for the proof reading, just a slip in
typing, faster than thinking. It was the same lens- the HSM version for
Canon. I had been "shopping around" and had made sure when I tried it out.


Stephen J. Krogh, P.G.
The PanTerra Group
http://panterragroup.home.mindspring.com

==========================================

*
****
*******
***********************************************************
*  For list instructions, including unsubscribe, see:
*    http://www.a1.nl/phomepag/markerink/eos_list.htm
***********************************************************

Reply via email to