On 3 Mar 2003 at 9:24, Robert Meier wrote: > > > >-----Original Message----- > >From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Willem-Jan > >Markerink > > > >Pretty impressive....I also vaguely recall having seen a similar site > >before....any more of these? > > > >http://www.wlcastleman.com/equip/reviews/Eos1Ds/build/building.htm > > This is a quite interesting link. The 1Ds is surpassing film and > getting closer to MF. The D60, though less grainy, is clearly less > sharp then the 1n. To my astonishment, the 1D is simply terrible. It > would be great to have more independent tests like this to verify > these results incl more details on post-processing. Does anybody have > any other such links?
Here is the one I mentioned, comparing it with a Pentax 6x7: http://www.luminous-landscape.com/reviews/shootout.shtml Note though that for projecting slides, there is still no alternative....beamers above screen resolution don't even exist. Nor is there an alternative for swing-lens (or even rotating camera) panorama photographers (not all subjects(moving!) are suitable for the digital stitching route, nor is a tripod suitable for all trips....;)) Combine the two, by projecting a 6x12cm Noblex slide with a Leitz large format Diaskop projector, and you couldn't match quality with even a dozen beamers stitched together....;)) -- Bye, Willem-Jan Markerink The desire to understand is sometimes far less intelligent than the inability to understand <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [note: 'a-one' & 'en-el'!] * **** ******* *********************************************************** * For list instructions, including unsubscribe, see: * http://www.a1.nl/phomepag/markerink/eos_list.htm ***********************************************************
