>-----Original Message----- >From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Bob Meyer >http://www.wlcastleman.com/equip/reviews/Eos1Ds/build/building.htm > >Be careful when comparing apples to oranges. The D60 >and 1D images were shot with a 28-70, the others with >a 50 1.4. While both are good lenses, there is no way >to know how much the lens difference affected the >results. And the different lenses makes me wonder if >the images were taken at different times. If so, >that's another variable to wonder about: different >apertures, more or less wind, and who knows what else.
The lens might make a difference but considering that both the 28-70/2.8 and 50/1.4 were used at f/16 makes it questionable if this explains the bad results of the 1D. I would rather question other circumstances as the kind of sharpening used, was a tripod used, etc. Looking at the images (shadows) it seems some time has passed between shots but the lightning does not differ that much. One other notable difference is that the 1D was the only camera used at ISO 200. But can that really explain the bad results or the 1D? This really makes me wonder if the tester had too much coffee... Robert * **** ******* *********************************************************** * For list instructions, including unsubscribe, see: * http://www.a1.nl/phomepag/markerink/eos_list.htm ***********************************************************
