----- Original Message -----
From: "Jim Davis" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, August 06, 2003 5:54 PM
Subject: EOS 10d metering and shutter rants


> Here's some thought to get things moving here perhaps...
>
> I'm convinced the metering in the 10d could be better, or there is a
> bug. Several times, while shooting a scene, shooting a series of 3 or
> 4 shots, maybe a couple of seconds apart, I've had one of the images
> be way underexposed. I check the EXIF info and find it's 2 or 3 stops
> underexposed from the others with basically the same scene.
>
> Now with partial metering I understand how this can happen, but I'm
> now using Evaluative mostly for the reason that I want more
> consistancy when I'm blazing away at a really important time.
>
> I thought evaluative broke up the scene into many segments of a grid.
> If indeed they do, the centre weighting of it would seem a bit
> extreme. Lately I took 3 photos each about 2 seconds apart. There was
> a slighty shift in some background elements, but exposure looked like
> I'd been using partial metering. Even centre-weighted shouldn't have
> given me 3 stops difference. How can 2 of the shots be so nicely
> exposed, while one way under? I like evaluative most of the time, but
> there seems to be some kind of bug in the camera exposure, or else
> evaluative is more like simple centre-weighted than we've been lead to
> believe.
>
> Isn't there some kind of database of scenes in camera memory that are
> being compared?
>
><snipped>
> Jim Davis
> Nature Photography
> http://www.kjsl.com/~jbdavis/

It's interesting you say that, because I've had the same occasional problem
with my A2 and, more frequently, my 1n, when set on evaluative. I just never
had the luxury of having an electronic note taker to tell me what the
problem was.
Skip Middleton
www.shadowcatcherimagery.com



*
****
*******
***********************************************************
*  For list instructions, including unsubscribe, see:
*    http://www.a1.nl/phomepag/markerink/eos_list.htm
***********************************************************

Reply via email to