Peter: The Tamron website no longer lists the 5448, only the two smaller ones, but I'm also looking for a bag. One that could carry the the 17-40L, a 70-200 2.8L, plus either a 300 f/4L or 100-400IS, and then either a 28-70L or 28-135, so four total lenses, plus a 550EX and either a 10D with grip or EOS 3 with booster. The 28-xx could be mounted to the camera. The specs I found on the web seem to show that the 5448 was deep enoough for the long lenses, but many bags are deep enough but not really designed to accomodate reversed hoods on the bigger Canon lenses. Or bodies with grips/boosters. Can you speak to how well the 5448 does in those regards, perhaps I could find a used one about.
Thanks! Tom P. ----- Original Message ----- From: "Kotsinadelis, Peter (Peter)" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Wednesday, October 22, 2003 10:51 AM Subject: EOS Bags > > > Greg Gimlick wrote: > > How about recommendations for a bag that will fit a 10D with 70-200 L > lens > mounted and still hold a couple smaller lenses. (28mm, 50mm, 28-80) I > wouldn't mind being able to hold my Elan II body as well, but not > absolutely > necessary. > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > ---------------------------- > Get a Tamrac 5448 Superlight 46. Best bag for what you want to put in > it. > You can see it on the Tamrac website but please be aware that the > photos on bag mfrs websites always show their bags carry 40% more than > they really do. > I have used this bag for years, it carries a EOS3 body with lens > attached, > 550EX flash, and 3 lenses plus film filters, etc. > > > Peter K * **** ******* *********************************************************** * For list instructions, including unsubscribe, see: * http://www.a1.nl/phomepag/markerink/eos_list.htm ***********************************************************
