Jerome, I was mostly using my 28-135 IS with 300D, even though I had 50/1.8 with me as well. I almost never used the 18-55 lens that comes with it. Only when I really needed the "true" 28mm. And that was travel photography.
What is interesting is that at the same time as I bought 300D, I bought a really cheap Sigma 70-300 APO. And I have to tell you, that for 170 USD that I paid for it (new) it is well worth it. AF is frustrating, but you just switch it to manual and off you go. Regards, Miha. > -----Original Message----- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > I am thinking of getting a prime lens to take travel, and > walk around pictures. I have a prime 85mm and I love it for portraits. > > I was thinking of a 50mm, but with the 1.6x cropping factor > it would be too long. > > Does anyone have experience with the 24mm 2.8, 28mm (1.8 or > 2.8), and 35mm 2.0 from Canon on a 300D? Or would I be better > off with the 17-40L or even a Tamron 28-75 DI? > * **** ******* *********************************************************** * For list instructions, including unsubscribe, see: * http://www.a1.nl/phomepag/markerink/eos_list.htm ***********************************************************
