> -----Original Message-----
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Bob Meyer
> Sent: Monday, December 01, 2003 6:19 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: OT: Re: EOS 70-200 IS effective range
> 
> 
> 
> --- David Heller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > 
> > As a side note, I was at my local camera store
> > yesterday to drop off film
> > for processing, and listened to some x-mas shopper
> > conversations with sales
> > people at the "digital" counter.  Teen-ager and her
> > father were looking at a
> > Digital Rebel and 18-55 lens.  Neither seemed to
> > know much about
> > photography, and they were looking at a camera for
> > her to take to college
> > next year. Girl & father couldn't understand why,
> > for $500 more, the Digital
> > Rebel could not 1) show image on LCD for framing a
> > shot like digital P&S
> > cameras and 2) make video clips like a digital P&S.
> 
> Frankly, neither do I.  Canon has shutter technology
> that will hold the shutter open and mirror up using no
> battery power.  While building the capability to do
> that into the Rebel might cause it to exceed the price
> point, it should be a part of the 10d and higher
> bodies, along with a pivoting LCD like the G2, G3 and
> G5 have.  Imagine how nice it would be to frame low
> angle shots from above, on an LCD screen aimed up the
> photographer.
> 
> I don't care about video clips, but the same shutter
> technology would make that fairly easy, too.
> 
> =====
> Bob Meyer
>


Hi Bob,

That's what $200 3MP point and shoot digitals are for!


Cheers/Chip

 

*
****
*******
***********************************************************
*  For list instructions, including unsubscribe, see:
*    http://www.a1.nl/phomepag/markerink/eos_list.htm
***********************************************************

Reply via email to