Henry Posner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote/replied to: > Here's what I know. I know that no one outside Canon knows what >will be and no one inside Canon is talking. I know the reason no one >outside knows is _because_ no one inside Canon is talking and I know why no >one inside Canon is talking. It's because any who did would be immediately >terminated and word would spread at light-speed that the individual in >question had blabbed and that person would NEVER work in this industry >again. I particularly know that an <important staff man> would be >PARTICULARLY sensitive to this issue and far less likely to blab than some >part-timer who'd read something inadvertently left on a photocopier and >told his roomie. I even know that those of us within this industry who do >like our jobs _and reputations_ respect an agreement not to discuss >sensitive data before its release date and that an individual who would is >( in my PERSONAL opinion) of low personal ethical calibre. Information from >an individual of that ilk is as worthwhile as his promise not to speak of it.
Wow, I guess the message you replied to got cut from the list :-) I agree totally. We're not talking about news that could actually benefit anyone financially really. We'll all just have to wait and see. They could release the ultimate camera that blows away every camera ever made and I could still wait for them to release it. Good grief. * **** ******* *********************************************************** * For list instructions, including unsubscribe, see: * http://www.a1.nl/phomepag/markerink/eos_list.htm ***********************************************************
