Chip, I agree on the C1 workflow. It is very quick, IMO. I used it with 300D RAW files and was pleased with it. And the price for 300D is right. I'm still not sure if I'd buy the version that covers D30...
> -----Original Message----- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Chip Louie > Ken Durling > > Sent: Monday, February 23, 2004 9:12 AM > > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Subject: Re: EOS Digital workflow > > > > Go for it! I have CS, and the RAW implementation is really nicely > > done. It's great not to have to go through the whole > routine anymore. > I suggest that anyone doing more than one or two images at a > time and wants > serious tools for RAW conversion to look into C1 Pro or at > least C1 SE. If > you are converting 1 or 100 files the workflow and interface > of C1 is much > better than PS-CS's ACR 2.X and C1's converted RAW image > files are cleaner > with more shadow detail and retained highlights than even the new and > improved release of ACR for PS-CS. While ACR 2.1 is a BIG > improvement over > the as shipped PS-CS ACR v2.0 it still trails C1's conversion > quality by > quite a bit. PS-CS ACR 2.0 had a problem with noise, color > shifting and > green blobs and other artifacts. If you then consider the workflow > advantages (i.e.. time savings), of C1 vs. ACR there is > really no contest. * **** ******* *********************************************************** * For list instructions, including unsubscribe, see: * http://www.a1.nl/phomepag/markerink/eos_list.htm ***********************************************************
