> > >3 x 2.057 = .943 difference
> > >4 x 2.742 = 1.258 difference
> > >5 x 3.428 = 1.572 difference
> > >6 x 4.113 = 1.887 difference
> > >7 x 4.799 = 2.201 difference
> > >8 x 5.484 = 2.516 difference
> > >9 x 6.17   = 2.830 difference
> > >10 x 6.855 = 3.145 difference
> > >11 x 7.541 = 3.459 difference
> > >12 x 8.226 = 3.774 difference
> > >14 x 9.597 = 4.403 difference
> > >20 x 13.711 = 6.289 difference
> > >
> > >etc. etc.
> > >
> > >Can someone explain this to me?
> >
> > ??????
> >
> > The ratios are the same. What do you mean?
> >
> 
> The ratios are the same ??????????    I guess I don't see how that can be
> when a 3 inch high photo has a width of 2 inches, and a 20 inch photo has a
> width of 14 inches.  That's a BIG difference between height / width ratio,
> (at least as I see it).  Obviously there is something here *I* am not
> understanding, and / or I am not getting across what I am meaning.  In other
> words, if a photo is sized at a height of 6 inches, and the width comes out
> to 4 inches (rounding numbers)... that is a difference of 2 inches.  So why
> does not a photo sized at 20 inches height have a width of 18 inches, (two
> inch difference), instead of the width of 14 inches, (a SIX inch
> difference)?????

The ratio is exactly that - a ratio - of height to width in
this case.   An it stays the same: 

3 / 2.057 = 1.458
4 / 2.742 = 1.458
5 / 3.428 = 1.458
6 / 4.113 = 1.458
7 / 4.799 = 1.458
8 / 5.484 = 1.458
9 / 6.17   = 1.458
10 / 6.855 = 1.458
11 / 7.541 = 1.458
12 / 8.226 = 1.458
14 / 9.597 = 1.458
20 / 13.711 = 1.458

You are talking about the difference which is (and should
be) getting proportionally larger as the format increases.

If you don't mind me asking,  where were you when
fractions were discussed in math class?

Regards,

Lars
-- 
 .~.   Lars Michael
 /V\   [EMAIL PROTECTED]
/(_)\  http://www.larsmichael.com/
^^ ^^
*
****
*******
***********************************************************
*  For list instructions, including unsubscribe, see:
*    http://www.a1.nl/phomepag/markerink/eos_list.htm
***********************************************************

Reply via email to