----- Original Message -----
From: "Lars Michael" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, March 24, 2004 12:40 PM
Subject: Re: EOS Photo size weirdness (was 8 x 12 photo paper)


> > > >3 x 2.057 = .943 difference
> > > >4 x 2.742 = 1.258 difference
> > > >5 x 3.428 = 1.572 difference
> > > >6 x 4.113 = 1.887 difference
> > > >7 x 4.799 = 2.201 difference
> > > >8 x 5.484 = 2.516 difference
> > > >9 x 6.17   = 2.830 difference
> > > >10 x 6.855 = 3.145 difference
> > > >11 x 7.541 = 3.459 difference
> > > >12 x 8.226 = 3.774 difference
> > > >14 x 9.597 = 4.403 difference
> > > >20 x 13.711 = 6.289 difference
> > > >
> > > >etc. etc.
> > > >
> > > >Can someone explain this to me?
> > >
> > > ??????
> > >
> > > The ratios are the same. What do you mean?
> > >
> >
> > The ratios are the same ??????????    I guess I don't see how that can
be
> > when a 3 inch high photo has a width of 2 inches, and a 20 inch photo
has a
> > width of 14 inches.  That's a BIG difference between height / width
ratio,
> > (at least as I see it).  Obviously there is something here *I* am not
> > understanding, and / or I am not getting across what I am meaning.  In
other
> > words, if a photo is sized at a height of 6 inches, and the width comes
out
> > to 4 inches (rounding numbers)... that is a difference of 2 inches.  So
why
> > does not a photo sized at 20 inches height have a width of 18 inches,
(two
> > inch difference), instead of the width of 14 inches, (a SIX inch
> > difference)?????
>
> The ratio is exactly that - a ratio - of height to width in
> this case.   An it stays the same:
>
> 3 / 2.057 = 1.458
> 4 / 2.742 = 1.458
> 5 / 3.428 = 1.458
> 6 / 4.113 = 1.458
> 7 / 4.799 = 1.458
> 8 / 5.484 = 1.458
> 9 / 6.17   = 1.458
> 10 / 6.855 = 1.458
> 11 / 7.541 = 1.458
> 12 / 8.226 = 1.458
> 14 / 9.597 = 1.458
> 20 / 13.711 = 1.458
>
> You are talking about the difference which is (and should
> be) getting proportionally larger as the format increases.
>
> If you don't mind me asking,  where were you when
> fractions were discussed in math class?
>
> Regards,
>
> Lars
> --

...guess I was daydreaming about the gal in the next desk... :-)  lol

Thanks for the help!
Steve




*
****
*******
***********************************************************
*  For list instructions, including unsubscribe, see:
*    http://www.a1.nl/phomepag/markerink/eos_list.htm
***********************************************************

Reply via email to