Lance wrote: > Hi all, > > I just bought an EOS 10D with a 16-35/f2.8L (which is a lot of fun), and I > am considering my next lens. Having seen all the writing about the triplet > "L"s, I am considering the 70-200/f2.8L IS and either the 1.4x or 2.0x > converter. Another option would be the 100-400L IS. What would be the next > best choice for portraits and wildlife?
I don't yet own the IS version of the 70-200 f2.8L, but the previous version that I have is one of my finest and most favored lenses. Great for both portraits AND wildlife. If you're going to eventually get the 24-70, go for the 70-200 now. You'll be very happy. Al Ruscelli Al Ruscelli Photography www.ruscelli.com e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] * **** ******* *********************************************************** * For list instructions, including unsubscribe, see: * http://www.a1.nl/phomepag/markerink/eos_list.htm ***********************************************************
