On Thursday July 15 2004 12:09 am, James B.Davis wrote: [snip]
> >I also have the 28-135 IS that I bought a while ago on my EOS 5. I will > >eventually get the 28-70 f2.8L to round out the quiver. > > 10D lenses: > Portraits: 50-70mm The 24-70mm f/2.8L is the replacement for the 28-70L for those who aren't aware of that. I use it and the 100mm macro for portraits. The later is over-looked WAY too much for this use. > Wildlife: never too long 400+ is good Agreed. [snip] > I love my 100-400L IS. I can't see using a 70-200 that much, those > focal length are kind of in the middle of what I do, and pretty much > covered by the 100-400. Only you can decide what you need. I need the 100-400L IS for wildlife images.....on the top of my list for my next lens. :) Fred -- "Ballmer is no more designed for the art of persuasion than the Abrams tank is for delivering meals on wheels." * **** ******* *********************************************************** * For list instructions, including unsubscribe, see: * http://www.a1.nl/phomepag/markerink/eos_list.htm ***********************************************************
