-----Original Message----- > Ken Lin said: > > > Hmmmm, I wonder why the image of the back is only 120x120 pixels? > > And DPREVIEW still has no news/review on it yet as of this morning. > > In order to do a review, the model has to be presented and available > first. But the news will be on the site shortly, I'm sure... > > > Is it fair to assume bodies that take the EF-S lens cannot take > > regular EF lenses? I tried to use an EF-S lens on a regular EOS > > body and it didn't fit. > > Actually, it's the other way around: EF mount lenses basically fit on all > EOS bodies, including the EF-S mount bodies. EF-S mount lenses only fit > EF-S mount bodies. > > With the introduction of the 20D, Canon appears to be introducing some new > optics as well: EF-S 17-85 IS USM 1:4-5.6 - see the head-on picture... > This sounds an awful lot like the 28-135 IS on 35mm to me ;-) > Interesting!!! >
was there a picture of it? the picture of the 10-whatever lens looked a little disappointing, a cheapy kit lens like the 18-55 ef-s. Marc (webmail) -------------------------- http://aurora.homedns.org * **** ******* *********************************************************** * For list instructions, including unsubscribe, see: * http://www.a1.nl/phomepag/markerink/eos_list.htm ***********************************************************
