On Wednesday August 18 2004 6:32 pm, Scott Laird wrote:
> On Aug 18, 2004, at 2:53 PM, Fred Miller wrote:
> >> The price seems high to me. Notwithstanding the higher spec, it needs
> >> to be
> >> priced to challenge the Nikon D70.
> >> The suggested street price is about the same as the 10D
> >> Still, perhaps there is a 300D replacement in the works, but not
> >> mentioned
> >> in the current leak.
> >
> > I think it is a "replacement".....maybe for both the 300D and 10D. It
> > would be
> > like Canon to come out with a cheaper "300D" by Fotokina.
>
> It's way too pricey to replace the 300D.  Besides, what's really wrong
> with the 300D?  It has the same nasty simplified UI as the rest of the
> rebel line, but that isn't *necessarily* a problem for its target
> market.  B&H has it for $200 cheaper then the D70; that's a decent
> chunk of change.

Understand, I don't disagree! I'm a pro. and use the dRebel ALL the time! I 
see NO problem with it. You could be right.....a replacement for the 10D. It 
may also not be a replacement for any current model, considering that it will 
be the ONLY 8.2MP dSLR for a street price of $1,300.

> >> There are some minor differences between the 10D and 20D: The flash
> >> now
> >> rises higher, similar to the 300D, and the shape of the hand grip
> >> seems
> >> slightly different, plus the corners are slightly sharper.
> >
> > Street price of $1300 (US) isn't that bad considering the
> > MP......that's WITH
> > a lens.
>
> Look at some of the other specs--it's a 5 FPS body with a 25 frame
> buffer.  That makes it faster then most of Canon's film bodies (without
> a booster, that is), and ties it with the Nikon D1H.  That doesn't
> sound like an entry-level body to me.  Canon has always used FPS as one
> of the differentiating factors between their bodies.  It sounds like
> it'll turn on as fast as a film body, it has their new flash system,
> and it's priced roughly the same as the 10D ($1,269 at B&H right now).

Yep........Canon also might bring down the price of the 10D.

> Assuming that Nikon doesn't add a new body this fall, here's what Canon
> and Nikon's low-end lineups look like (using B&H's cheap price for the
> D70):
>
>    $800   Canon 300D (6 MP, 2.5 FPS, 4 frame buffer)
>    $1000 Nikon D70 (6 MP, 3 FPS, 12 frame buffer)
>    $1300 Canon 20D (8 MP, 5 FPS, 25 frame buffer)
>
> Most other vendors want almost $1300 for the D70.  It's hard to see how
> someone can complain that the 20D is overpriced.

It isn't.

Fred

-- 
"Running Windows on a Pentium is like getting a Porsche but only being
able to drive it in reverse with the handbrake on."
*
****
*******
***********************************************************
*  For list instructions, including unsubscribe, see:
*    http://www.a1.nl/phomepag/markerink/eos_list.htm
***********************************************************

Reply via email to