> Meanwhile, if you'd like Mr Rockwell's opinion.......
> <http://www.kenrockwell.com/tech/raw.htm> That's a good read, and I happen to agree with his opinion, even at the risk of offending some purists.... I've shot 15,000 frames on the 1D Mk II since last July, there are about a doezen shots I took using RAW setting only because I didn't have bright enough lighting and wanted to take advantage of the "up to 2-stops" adjustment capability. The rest are all shot in large .jpg at 8 setting, I haven't relly tried the 10 (maximum) setting only because I am getting images that I am perfectly happy with, even printing to 20"x30". I am sure there are benefits of RAW, color balance is probably the biggest one, but if I am getting perfectly acceptable images from L .jpg, why would I shoot RAW? Ken -------------------------------------------------------------------- mail2web - Check your email from the web at http://mail2web.com/ . * **** ******* *********************************************************** * For list instructions, including unsubscribe, see: * http://www.a1.nl/phomepag/markerink/eos_list.htm ***********************************************************
