Anyone have personal experience comparing the 400/5.6L with the
100-400 IS at the long end in terms of critical sharpness? I'd
expect the prime to be sharper, and have seen some soft images from
the 100-400, but there are so many intervening factors that I'm not
sure how to judge.
Thanks
Ken
*
****
*******
***********************************************************
* For list instructions, including unsubscribe, see:
* http://www.a1.nl/phomepag/markerink/eos_list.htm
***********************************************************
