Ken * **** ******* *********************************************************** * For list instructions, including unsubscribe, see: * http://www.a1.nl/phomepag/markerink/eos_list.htm ***********************************************************
Hmm, and with a doubler you've got a smaller version of the 100-400,
doncha? Seems to me Reichmann compared these...
- EOS To IS or not to IS? Mike Thomas
- Re: EOS To IS or not to IS? Ken Durling
- Re: EOS To IS or not to IS? Ken Durling
- Re: EOS To IS or not to IS? Harman Bajwa
- RE: EOS To IS or not to IS? Tom Pfeiffer
- Re: EOS To IS or not to IS? Richard Acuff
- Re: EOS To IS or not to IS? Cotty
- RE: EOS To IS or not to IS? Tom Pfeiffer
- RE: EOS To IS or not to IS? Ken Durling
- Re: EOS To IS or not to IS? Julian Loke
- Re: EOS To IS or not to IS? Henning Wulff
- Re: EOS To IS or not to IS? Ken Durling
- RE: [inbox] EOS To IS or not to IS? Chip Louie
- RE: [inbox] EOS To IS or not to IS? Tom Pfeiffer
- RE: EOS To IS or not to IS? Marc Lawrence
- Re: RE: EOS To IS or not to IS? James B . Davis
- RE: EOS To IS or not to IS? Michael Good
- RE: EOS To IS or not to IS? Kotsinadelis, Peter (Peter)
- RE: EOS To IS or not to IS? Michael Good
