Michael Good wrote:

And just to add my own 2 cents..

I've recently been trying to join a stock photography agency.  I had
some great images I thought they'd love.  They looked really sharp on my
monitor.  But bam... The agency came back and said sorry not sharp
enough, out of focus.  I couldn't believe it.  I'd used L glass and IS
but they were hand held.  OK so they look sharp and would probably print
sharp at A4-A3 size but if you look at them at 100% pixel size you can
actually see that they're not that sharp at all.  I was disapointed but
it did bring home a good point.  If you can use a tripod / monopod /
string attached to shoe (very cheap) then do it.  Don't always rely on
IS for commercial work.

Hope that helps a little.

Michael.
----------------------------------------------------

What did you send them to review? Scanned files? JPEGs? This could also
impact perceived sharpness.
*
****
*******
***********************************************************
*  For list instructions, including unsubscribe, see:
*    http://www.a1.nl/phomepag/markerink/eos_list.htm
***********************************************************

Reply via email to