Ok.. someone please set me straight. When you speak of the LUMISPHERE,
are you referring to the Gary Fong LIGHTSPHERE???? I have never heard
of a lumisphere, and I have never heard the *lightsphere* referred to
as a lumisphere before now. I have used the lightspheres for a long
time and have always been very satisfied with them. I currently use the
LS2 with the frosted interior, and the inverted dome on at all times. I
talked personally with Gary Fong about this at one of his seminars, and
he recommends using the inverted dome installed in nearly all cases. It
is purposely designed to give you the bounce and diffusion you need
regardless of room conditions. Take note, this is the very newest dome.
It actually extends down inside of the lightsphere itself, it does not
form a dome on the top of the lightsphere housing.
Steve
On May 2, 2006, at 11:02 AM, Rob Chandler wrote:
Kotsinadelis, Peter (Peter) wrote:
Joerg Thomas Klein wrote:
W S wrote:
I thought one of the claims was the difference in the amount of
light required to do the same exposure. That is the Lumisphere was
suppose to be more light efficient. I would be curious to know if
that will be
in the results?
- ------------------------------------------
At the present this appears to be more marketing hype than anything
else.
Hi
It'll be interesting to see the final results. I think I'm the only
one in our "gang" that's still using a StoFen diffuser, everyone else
has switched to a Lumisphere. After the Lumisphere novelty wore off I
started to hear some interesting comments from those that switched
(maybe they've noticed that there isn't much of a difference).
Rob
*
****
*******
***********************************************************
* For list instructions, including unsubscribe, see:
* http://www.a1.nl/phomepag/markerink/eos_list.htm
***********************************************************
