> W S wrote: > > I thought one of the claims was the difference in the amount of light > required to do the same exposure. That is the Lumisphere was suppose to > be more light efficient. I would be curious to know if that will be in > the results? > - ------------------------------------------ > Wayne, > > So far we see no difference. A larger diffuser should provide a larger > light source but at a reduced output comparativley speaking. We are > shootin a subject at about 7 feet in a studio with white background to > see shadows and exactly what the results will yield in terms of shadows > and light. Again, no difference thus far visually and the histogram of > the Spehere and omnibounce are identical. > > Peter K
Hello Peter Have you measured the recycling times after the flashes to see, which needs more energy? Greetings from Germany Thomas * **** ******* *********************************************************** * For list instructions, including unsubscribe, see: * http://www.a1.nl/phomepag/markerink/eos_list.htm ***********************************************************
