Francis Zhou wrote:
So far, the split is right down the middle. The cost difference is not big
enough to sway me either way. I think I can handle the weight difference, too,
having got used to the 70-200/2.8 in the bag. The extra reach of 24-105 is nice
for a one-lens walk around kind of shooting, but I do have the 70-200 if I
really need that extra reach. Of course, that becomes a two-lens deal. Some
people mentioned a slight edge in sharpness and bokeh in favor of 24-70/2.8,
how about color, contrast, focusing speed? Is that edge in bokeh because of the
wider aperture?
Thanks,
I'm see that no one has sent this to you yet:
http://www.luminous-landscape.com/reviews/lenses/28-105.shtml.
Look at the site since even though it says 28-105 it compares the 24-105
&B 24-70.
Bob
--
/////
( O O )
--------------------oOOO-----O----OOOo-----73 de [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Curiosity killed the cat although I was a suspect for a while........
*
****
*******
***********************************************************
* For list instructions, including unsubscribe, see:
* http://www.a1.nl/phomepag/markerink/eos_list.htm
***********************************************************
