I've used my FD 135/2.5 SC (one of my favorites) a lot that way, and
it's a wonderful look. By extension I'd expect the EF 135/2 to be
fabulous.
Ken
At 09:14 AM 3/11/2007, you wrote:
Hope this is easier to read. The 135 F2 is an excellent lens with
an extension tube. Bear in mind macros were really designed for
flat fields with edge-to-edge sharpness. Regular lenses for 3D
objects. So in effect the 135mm should make a 1st rate close up
with extension tubes. Peter K ----- Original Message ---- From:
Wayne S <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To:
There weren't many FD IF lenses, and that makes all the difference. I
never used the 135/2.5, but I would bet it would be a lot better with
extension tubes than the EF 135.
--
* Henning J. Wulff
/|\ Wulff Photography & Design
/###\ mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
|[ ]| http://www.archiphoto.com
*
****
*******
***********************************************************
* For list instructions, including unsubscribe, see:
* http://www.a1.nl/phomepag/markerink/eos_list.htm
***********************************************************
