On 31 January 2018 at 09:57, Ken Dreyer <[email protected]> wrote:
> On Sat, Jan 27, 2018 at 4:45 PM, Todd Zullinger <[email protected]> wrote: > > Stephen John Smoogen wrote: > >> I thought aarch64 was also supported for this. > > > > It looks like the devtoolset bits are still in the sclo > > testing repositories for aarch64ยน. We could potentially > > enable those in the mock configs if they're ready for more > > testing. Or we can wait for them to reach stable. > > Yeah, I wish this was more widely documented, but CentOS' DTS 7 is now > built for ppc64le and aarch64. > > So we have a problem with what is the canonical place for SCL's. I was going from http://mirror.centos.org/centos/7/sclo/ which just says x86_64. There are parts built in CBS but it isn't clear that these are any more official than a Fedora COPR... I will let someone with releng experience say whether that is ok or not. > https://bugs.centos.org/view.php?id=14078 > > - Ken > _______________________________________________ > epel-devel mailing list -- [email protected] > To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected] > -- Stephen J Smoogen.
_______________________________________________ epel-devel mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
