On 02/01/2018 07:40 AM, Todd Zullinger wrote:
> Tom "spot" Callaway wrote:
>> On 01/31/2018 10:53 AM, Stephen John Smoogen wrote:
>>> So we have a problem with what is the canonical place for SCL's. I was
>>> going from http://mirror.centos.org/centos/7/sclo/ which just says x86_64. 
>> Even just getting x86_64 devtoolset into the potential buildroot for
>> EPEL would be hugely helpful to me, because that's all chromium cares
>> about right now.
> I filed a pull request to update mock-core-configs:
> https://github.com/rpm-software-management/mock/pull/159
> If anyone here knows relevant folks on the SCL team who can
> provide some input on the preferred/canonical repository
> URLs (or any other issues with that PR), it would be great.
> I tend to think that the mock configs we ship should use
> whatever URLs the centos-release-scl{,-rh} packages use.
> That's what end-users would see if they wanted to rebuild
> packages outside of mock.  If those change we can always
> update them in mock-core-configs to match.

Well, that will help people who do local mock builds, but won't do
anything for koji/epel. ;)

I think at this point it just needs someone to do the setup, and I think
Peter said he could. If not, I can put it on my list, but not sure when
I would get to it.


Attachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

epel-devel mailing list -- epel-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to epel-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

Reply via email to