Hi Folks, As micro-increments are completed the little gear turns, it turns the iteration gear which in turn advances the project gear. One could argue this *is* the feedback.
Just my $0.02 CDN. Cheers, Chris -----Original Message----- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Ben Williams Sent: Thursday, October 25, 2007 6:29 AM To: Eclipse Process Framework Project Developers List Subject: RE: [epf-dev] OpenUP Summary Graphic I agree Steve, it would be very good to indicate not only the feedback loop used for planning purposes, but the continuous process improvement aspect also. Ben -----Original Message----- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Steve Adolph Sent: Tuesday, October 23, 2007 4:42 PM To: 'Eclipse Process Framework Project Developers List' Subject: RE: [epf-dev] OpenUP Summary Graphic And now for something completely different...well not completely.... I was looking at the summary graphic and I've just noticed there is nothing that indicates feedback. We do not show any kind of feedback, no feedback from the iteration into the project plan, no feedback into the process...I think we need to at least have an arrow feeding back from the iteration plan to the project plan to at least suggest the project plan changes in response to lessons learned during iteration. Now if we could also discover a way to show feedback improving the process...hmmm a little Charlie Chaplin like mechanic receiving instructions from an iteration retrospective? Best regards, Steve Adolph -----Original Message----- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, October 23, 2007 2:22 AM To: Eclipse Process Framework Project Developers List Subject: Re: [epf-dev] OpenUP Summary Graphic Hi Ben I have finally had the chance to look at the graphic properly (blackberry's are great for some things and not for others). I think that the changes you have shown seem good IMHO - they do seem cosmetic in terms of the intent of the original diagram but I completely understand that they may make the diagram more acceptable to mechanical engineers :-) As per previous discussion on this thread, I think we should consider adding a build product to the micro-increment - something that represents a build similar to an integration stream / nightly build idea of course, rather than a shippable build. In principal, this too could be "demo-able" (is that a real word?). cheers Mark Mark Dickson Executive Consultant EAS Practice m 0780 1917480 w www.xansa.com e [EMAIL PROTECTED] "Ben Williams" <[EMAIL PROTECTED] elogic.com> To Sent by: "Eclipse Process Framework Project [EMAIL PROTECTED] Developers List" clipse.org <[email protected]> cc 10 October 2007 Subject 13:14 ZE2 [epf-dev] OpenUP Summary Graphic Please respond to Eclipse Process Framework Project Developers List <[EMAIL PROTECTED] org> Hi all We have been speaking with various customers about EPF and OpenUP. We have received feedback that the main OpenUP graphic (the cogs) is distracting because: - it uses a mechanical metaphor to illustrate an integrated process, yet the mechanics do not mesh - there is no way that the two cogs could actually mesh - the elongated tooth on the iteration cog is odd - these issues distract from the conceptual message being conveyed I have attached a modified version - this is just an example of how the deficiencies in the graphic could be addressed - the graphic should be corrected properly by someone with better photoshop skills :) (Embedded image moved to file: pic05831.jpg)cid:752485009@10102007-10D6 Thoughts? Ben Collaborate to Innovate! Register today for Telelogic's annual User Group Conference November 19-21 in South Wales Learn more at www.telelogic.com/campaigns/2007/ugc/uk/index.cfm ------------------------------------------------------------------------ ---- ---- Telelogic Lifecycle Solutions: Helping You Define, Design & Deliver Advanced Systems & Software Learn More at www.telelogic.com Ben Williams Director of Product Management, Lifecycle Solutions Telelogic UK Ltd Northbrook House, Oxford Science Park OX4 4GA, Oxford United Kingdom Phone: +44 020 7193 7067 Fax: +44 (1865) 784 286 Mobile phone:+44 (7710) 637 067 [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.telelogic.com Telelogic - Requirements-Driven Innovation! ------------------------------------------------------------- The information contained in this e-mail, including any attachment or enclosure, is intended only for the person or entity to which it is addressed and may contain confidential material. Any unauthorized use, review, retransmissions, dissemination, copying or other use of this information by persons or entities other than the intended recipient is prohibited. _______________________________________________ epf-dev mailing list [email protected] https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/epf-dev Whilst this email has been checked for all known viruses, recipients should undertake their own virus checking as Xansa will not accept any liability whatsoever. This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and protected by client privilege. It is solely for the use of the intended recipient. Please delete it and notify the sender if you have received it in error. Unauthorised use is prohibited. Any opinions expressed in this email are those of the individual and not necessarily the organisation. Xansa, Registered Office: 420 Thames Valley Park Drive, Thames Valley Park, Reading, RG6 1PU, UK. Registered in England No.1000954. t +44 (0)8702 416181 w www.xansa.com _______________________________________________ epf-dev mailing list [email protected] https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/epf-dev _______________________________________________ epf-dev mailing list [email protected] https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/epf-dev _______________________________________________ epf-dev mailing list [email protected] https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/epf-dev
