Spledid, moving rhetoric Georges. Rather witty too. How human.
On 27 Aug, 00:39, adrf <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Did you get it?
> Add it up. He's on 7000 odd websites or something. Nobody can handle that. So
> it needs a filter
> program. That's costly and tricky. Who pays for that, not him.
> Is it nuts, doubtful There's method in his madness. with what intent?
> If not nuts what's he into?
> Since there's more to language than countain and peddling peanuts. he ain't
> talking COMMON
> sense, which makes most people move off. What kind of uncommon sense does it
> make, already
> explained.
> adrian
>
>
>
> ornamentalmind wrote:
> > Light the pyre!
>
> > On Aug 26, 11:21 am, Georges Metanomski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >> Periodically a newbie or an old-timer suffering
> >> a crisis of soul awakening erupts in a fierce tale told
> >> by an idiot, full of sound and fury, signifying nothing.
> >> We are now amidst such particularly violent eruption
> >> of a rabid newbie seconded by a bandwagon of impressed
> >> sheep. We survived several such crap tsunamis. They usually
> >> whirl idly for a few weeks and vanish without a trace,
> >> passing by me as the idle wind, which I respect not,
> >> leaving just a fetid smell.
> >> Georges.- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Epistemology" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/epistemology?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
