Okay ADRF:
My own background is more in the "humanities" and "classical
literature"... Italian Literature, mostly.... from pre-Dante up to...
let's say...fifty years ago, or so.... But I haven't kept up with it
for quite a while. Anyway, I have a fairly competent appreciation for
actual philosophy, as well.  I have developed a "preference" for the
nominalists (especially William of Ockham)... it fits in with by
"literary" leanings...  as in pre-semiotics, and all. But I think (or
like to believe) that I know a bit about many other philosophical
directions... Idealism, Realism and Phenomenology (along with
Nominalism) being my own broad overall epistemological categories.
Here's a link to my own prior postings on these Message Boards... "I
have never Met a Circle" here in Epistemology and "Nominal9"s Method
needs home" in Humanities. Just if you care to look ....  anything of
interest to you I will gladly discuss.... I just don't want to
"impose" my views on you if you have no interest.
http://groups.google.com/group/epistemology/browse_thread/thread/e716760b69f3405/5b308c34428acc13?lnk=gst&q=I+have+never+met+a+circle#5b308c34428acc13
http://groups.google.com/group/humanities/browse_thread/thread/d9861d3dcc39fd71/5709d689e7ad2bc7?lnk=gst&q=Nominal9%27s+Method+needs+home#5709d689e7ad2bc7
Anyway.... you say that you have been.... shooed away from another
philosophy group for "unorthodoxy" in refusing to bow down to the
Deity of Platonic Idealism????? If you read my "circle" thread a bit
you will see that my suggestion as a retort to any Idealist is to tell
him or her..... "Like it or not, your ass stinks"....
But, if you are not an Idealist.... what would you say that you
are.... Realist, Phenomenologist,Nominalist.....something else?
As to your views on evolution (in an Un-Darwinian way).... that would
require some more explanation from you in order for me to get a notion
of what you are talking about..... sounds "rebellious"....
nominal9

On Sep 1, 9:49 am, adrf <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Thank you, I most cases I've already read what he parrots. and I don't find 
> or feel I have to
> put up with his Kafka-esque puerilities, much as I agree about free speech. 
> It's just like
> rats. They have a right to exist, but not necessarily in my parlour. That 
> sort of exists from
> the pro- and eukaryotes upwards to defend out the unwanted so one can exist 
> in one's own right.
>   It's what Crick and Watson found as Anti-biotics which now ruins our lives. 
> I already have
> enough putting up with martinet bureaucrats. Harmless looking frogs have 
> poisonous skins which
> then birds who eat them have to adjust their metabolism. I've spent most of 
> my life
> metaphysically retreating into isolation because I most agree they have a 
> right to exist but
> not in my parlour. That's how an ecology works. I have or had a USA friend 
> living in a forest.
> It has a brown bear who stays off his verandah but is quite fierce that when 
> friend enter HIS
> forest bear too is left to be himself.
>
> Many people feel we have to share, etc blahh, and be homogenised romantics, 
> that too I don't
> have to put up with. Perhaps it is, and perhaps it is my past lives, but I am 
> into evolution in
> a way Darwin got altogether wrong. So it is not in some future but right now 
> I would be happy
> to compare notes about you and me. It's like going to a pub filled up with 
> all sorts but also
> into small groups of like mind. I've just unsubscribed from another google 
> philosophy group
> where because  I don't believe, haha, in Plato's ideal ideas I am now being 
> moderated. It is
> not quantum theory that's weird, Its people. And If I find people don't want 
> to discuss me and
> my ideas, Ok, I'll retreat into solitude.
>
> There's a big problem going on right now I am interested in. In words of one 
> sentence what?
>
> adrian
>
>
>
> nominal9 wrote:
> > Hello ADRF....
> > I was a newcomer on this group myself, six months ago or so, and I got
> > much worse treatment from Georges than you have , as yet.- Hide quoted text 
> > -
>
> - Show quoted text -
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Epistemology" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/epistemology?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to