On 5 Set, 13:10, adrf <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > No, not really, Plotinus told us that. WE are Not God, God is us, different > kettle of fish.
God is THE EXENCE, like the <wood>. Now, if I am a tree, I <also am wood> even if I am not all the wood. On the contrary, if I say that the <wood is me>, I reduce the wood to my single condition, and it is not exact. When I say: <I am wood>, I refer my to belong to the wood exence. Another example: I am Romano in my name and Amodeo in my family. So I can say to be an <Amodeo>, but if I say: <Amodeo is myself> it isn't much exact, because Amodeo is also my brother, my Father, my Grandfather... For the same reason I <am> God (and nothing else), and God <is> He and US and <not only> me. > Presuming God means cosmic sentience, not an angry old man sitting on a > cloud, like Zeus. > God actually does not "know" anything, if he did he'd blow a fuse. God is THE ABSOLUTE. In our condition, we aren't absolute ones but relative ones. But, since we are certainly in a real relation with the <absolute power>, the communication, the real relation necessarily must use our relative language. I say that the <absolute> is like one that knows all the languages. So its communication with me uses my language and only mine, if I know only one. Since my language uses my reason, my mind, the Absolute uses my reason and my mind to speak to me. I am a <person> and the Absolute (God) takes the form of a <person>. I am son of a father and of a mother and the Absolute takes the Form of Father, Holy Spirit and Son. And this answer has its full reason to be so. This - but - doesn't mean that the Absolute (God) is IN ALL like we imagine him, but ALSO in this way, in his relation with us. > I prefer sentience to consciousness, it has no synonyms and it means > everything is sentient or made thereof. So in a funny sense adding us and god > together, we, as > all sentience around, create him in our collective images, like a kid playing > with silly putty. > Agreeable? > Adding our Impotence to God's Potency, we, together, do His Omnipotency. If God was only Potency, it was not Absolute, but with the bond of the Potency. Only when He is US, he has also the Impotenze, and Potency +Impotency does the Absolute condition of a lack of bonds. God, for us, is the divine raising of our EGO. Romano > > > amoram wrote: > > Also you are God ! > > The only ESSENCE is his. > > So our own is only His ESSENCE. > > We are like a MIKY MOUSE that is the life of his Father, in all its > > apparent actions, of the mind and of the body. > > Hi, > > Romano > > > On 2 Set, 01:38, einseele <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> Answer directly with no fear: > > >> Are you God? > > >> On 31 jul, 01:08, amoram <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > >>> 25 centuries ago the Philosopher Pythagoras had the intuition of a > >>> world built by the numbers. > >>> We of the N.I.S. opened again his <Italic School> of and named it New > >>> Italic School. In our school was respected also the Eleatica School, > >>> that believed in the fundamental <To be> of everything, and the > >>> Religion based on Jahve, the God of this <To Be>. > >>> We of the N.I.S. have proved how the world is built by the numbers, in > >>> the general <to be> of the Soul, having our Soul the ability to count > >>> by numbers. > >>> The "GOD" of the numbers is 10^1, and his "SON" is 10^-1, while the > >>> Holy Spirit of the Truth is the relation 10^1 × 10^-1 = 10^(-1 +1) = > >>> 10^0 = 1. > >>> The POWER in base 10 is like the GOD’s power. > >>> It is the Father of everything and so it is possible to consider only > >>> the exponents +1 and -1, of a Creation having all this cycle 10 for > >>> common base. > >>> When the Physicists and Mathematicians of the Academia François > >>> pushed in order to have all the units of the Physic conformed by the > >>> 10 cycle, they recognized this "GOD" 10, of the general essence of the > >>> world. > >>> The Creation of the common 10 base, so, is the couple -1 and +1. > >>> It can exist in 2 general ways, summed and perceived in dynamical way > >>> how +1 perceived by reaction in base to the inverse -1. > >>> -1 +1, in its sum, gets 0 > >>> In its action-reaction perception, gets +1. > >>> The number 10 is the first to be 1 and 0, as a sequence perceived in > >>> hierarchical way. > >>> A unitary system was launched, in this way: > >>> 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 > >>> 1 1 0 0 1 1 0 0 1 1 0 0 1 1 0 0 > >>> 1 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 1 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 > >>> 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 > >>> 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 > >>> Here we have 4 generations of 1 and 0 starting from the base 1. The > >>> calculus in power of this base system is 2^4 = 16 different columns of > >>> binary ORDERS (like in the computer system). > >>> In the Religion, the general base was the only one Adam. The second > >>> row contains Adam and Eva, she like Adam’s derivation. > >>> In all we have these 80 numbers, as 2^3 (the binary volume) > >>> multiplied by the 10 cycle. > >>> It represents all the complex of the reality, 40 decimal dimensions as > >>> real ones, 40 as imaginary ones. > >>> 16, the charge of the light, represents these 16 columns. > >>> 16 -10 = 6 gets the 6 directions +x +y +z –x –y –z of the Avogadro > >>> Number. > >>> It is a 6 that runs exactly 10 times, in these general first 16 > >>> columns of the 80 orders. > >>> From the 10 (the movement of 6 in 16) have gotten all the ways that > >>> we have, to consider simultaneously the different forms of the SI > >>> system of our units: mass, time, space, electric energy, temperature, > >>> molecule and Candela (intensity of the light). In this way: > >>> 0/10 gets the virtual beginning > >>> 1/9 gets the unitary mass [0,111111….] > >>> 2/8 gets the unitary time [¼ of t in xyzt as t/xyzt] > >>> 3/7 gets the unitary space [0.428571 periodic (volume’s model)] > >>> 4/6 gets the unitary electric energy [0.66666… (Planck’s const.)] > >>> 5/5 gets the unitary electromagnetism [5×55 -0.368 = 0° absol.] > >>> 6/4 gets the unitary molecule [0.6 ×10^(6×4)] > >>> 7/3 gets the unitary Candela [77×7 +7/7 = 540] > >>> 8/2 gets the unitary complex reality [4] > >>> 9/1 gets the unitary energy [Einstein c^2] > >>> 10/0 gets the unitary absolute cycle > >>> In this way the 10 cycle allows to perceive simultaneously the same 10 > >>> units of the presence that is in movement like an unit. > >>> This 16 columns can be considered in both the possibilities: 10 that > >>> moves of 6 times, or 6 unitary spaces that move of 10. > >>> With 2^10=1,024 we have the 10^3, model of the volume, which turn in > >>> 24 hours. > >>> With 10^2=100 we have THE ABSOLUTE area of the cubic flow having the > >>> SIDE 10 of its real flow. > >>> This general scheme, that I here haven’t explained but only shown, is > >>> the basic scheme of all our ideal construction and perception of the > >>> world, entirely made by our Soul, through his calculations !!! > >>> Therefore, when the Physicists start from masses, energies… etc they > >>> don’t start from the real beginning, because the true beginning is our > >>> Soul, being us this 10^-1 GOD’S SON, that gives the general form to > >>> the Binary System equivalent to GOD FATHER. > >>> To have the infinite unit of the existence we launch this elementary > >>> calculus: > >>> 10 : 9 = 1.11111111111… and we have the infinite decimal unit of the > >>> time-mass directed to the FUTURE TIME. > >>> The inverse calculus 1,1111111… × 9 = 9,9999999… gets the PAST TIME, > >>> until the extreme limit of the possible, and so we “virtually” see > >>> also what “existed”… before us. > >>> Since we all are contained in the same unitary system of this POWER IN > >>> BASE 10, also if everyone has his own column of binary orders, we all > >>> see the same Universe like the representation of the whole common > >>> system. And this Universe has no limit, as 10 : 9 = 1,1111… hasn’t it. > >>> This 9 is the Einstein c^2 of the General Relativity. > >>> This is the Epistemology! It is to arrive at the extreme limits of the > >>> existence, where the real experience cannot arrive! > >>> Romano Amodeo- Nascondi testo citato > >> - Mostra testo citato -- Nascondi testo citato > > - Mostra testo citato - --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Epistemology" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/epistemology?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
