Hi Neil You can mention your work and then link your knol(s) with as many sites of your own as you want. Google itselfs gives you the option of creating all those sites for free, and with a simple tool to build them up, btw. You can invite your peers to publish on those sites along with you, and by means of simple links you can go back and forth from knols to the sites, like a small network of your own. You will be exposed widely, in case that is of you interest.
regards Carlos On Sep 6, 7:54 am, archytas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > To access my knol paper you have to go to knol and search for 'human > rights' - this turns the crud up. It would be handy for me to be able > to load up all my papers and I fancy the idea of writing with a few > other people and getting knowledge out there for free. I tried to > work out whether I could give my dog ibuprofen recently and the Net > was useless, as were journals and our vet. I can't see how knol is > going to get rid of the useless stuff, but it would be great if it > could. > > On 6 Sep, 10:41, archytas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > On the subject of Pythagoras, rule 2 was 'do not eat beans' and other > > rules forbade picking anything that had fallen up. He was something > > of a tyrannical arse rather than divine. > > > On knol - I posted a dreadful paper on it to try it out - some crud > > written for a conference in Istanbul in vaguely Freudian style. I'm > > looking for somewhere to post my work so others can access it. Orn > > will forgive my smile on 'not meeting personal needs' - the hardcopy > > could at least have use as toilet paper. I'm going to post more - > > essentially it's only any good if others can access it, but expect > > I'll end up doing this through scholar. The key thing is somewhere > > with space to host and that search engines will find. Works on the > > first, but not the latter so far. > > > On 5 Sep, 22:03, ornamentalmind <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > "...God is THE ABSOLUTE. In our condition, we aren't absolute ones but > > > relative ones. But, since we are certainly in a real relation with the > > > absolute power, the communication, the real relation necessarily must > > > use our relative language. I say that the <absolute> is like one that > > > knows all the languages. So its communication with me uses my language > > > and only mine, if I know only one. Since my language uses my reason, > > > my mind, the Absolute uses my reason and my mind to speak to me...." - > > > amo > > > > I guess this all leaves theurgy out of the realm of possibilities? > > > > And, of course, the triune has been known 'forever'. Earlier, Plotinus > > > was mentioned. His triune description is not bad. > > > > On Sep 5, 10:46 am, amoram <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > On 5 Set, 19:28, einseele <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > On Sep 5, 8:25 am, amoram <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > > Also you are God ! > > > > > > The only ESSENCE is his. > > > > > > So our own is only His ESSENCE. > > > > > > We are like a MIKY MOUSE that is the life of his Father, in all its > > > > > > apparent actions, of the mind and of the body. > > > > > > Hi, > > > > > > Romano > > > > > > I'd rather say you are like Donald Duck, though he is funnier > > > > > Thanks! > > > > Romano- Hide quoted text - > > > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text - > > > - Show quoted text - --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Epistemology" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/epistemology?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
