Dear Adrian, when everyone does his reserch, the Faith moves his
convinction. So there is who is considered a real student of the true
events, and there is who is judged a day-dreamer, a visionary.
I am sure that the apostles, all dead men in order to give evidence to
the Jesus truth, are worthy of the biggest esteem.
So I and you cannot discuss, because our men worthy of the biggest
esteem are different and in contradiction.
Here we do Epistemology, and, through the Philosophy of the science,
each of us make his supposition, with coerency on some fundament, in a
knowledge that - as you show - is based on different knowledges.
I have not the idea to modify your fundament, and you, starting from
it, make your conclusions, and you do well, doing it in coherency...
In the same way I do mine, and are contrary and opposite to your and I
also am in coherency...
I thing that fortunately it is coming the time to know the truth of
Donad Duck Romano Amodeo... or his visionary context.
We must expect only till the October 13th... so only 36 days.
I and you will see what really happens... without the necessity of
students or who gives evidence.
I am sure of the Jesus EXISTENCE because I have him in myself, and
only I can know this.
But I am alsu sure that HIS REAL PRESENCE in me hasn't happened only
for me, but also for you and everyone hasn't Faith in HIS existence.
So you'll have soon a PROOF of what I'm saying: I'll be killed and in
me again Jesus will be killed, with his Father and his Holy Spirit.
So the ARBITER of our impossible discussion - so based on different
Faiths - will be THE REALITY.
It is useless to discuss. I have Faith and confide in my Faith. You
haven't it and dfo differently.
But the EVENTS will confirm my Faith... or not, and this will be the
ARBITER between us.
I'm in the most coherency with my Faith and I haven't fear to be
contradict by it.
So we'll se who has reason and who hasn't.
Certainly for you I'm a visionary Donald Duck. I know it and it is not
necessary that you or other tell it again.
I have the courage of my faith, and we'll see if it is only an
illusion!
Goodby from me... a Donald Duck... but in the powerful hands of my
God, who certainly will help me to win this real challange made with
you.
Romano Amodeo.
On 5 Set, 22:40, adrf <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Romano, that's Donald Duck talk.
>
> Some recent research into this Jesus myth esablishes that
> 1: The Jesus tale resembles a typical saviour myth with motifs also found in
> other and much
> older myths. So even given a Jesus existed the bible asscribed fictional,
> borrowed motifs to a
> person.
> 2: The availability of new material shows, in the opinion of experts that
> Jesus never existed.
> The actual biblical material was written quite a while, some estimates go to
> 200 AD, after the
> birth of Jesus.
> 3: I suggest you do some research into "saviour myths".559,000 sites, happy
> reading. The same
> motif is found by Anthropology as cargo cults, where a saviour will come with
> all required
> goodies as also take us away to a safe place. In Ufology this occurs as
> aliens arriving before
> earth global disasters come along and take us to another planet. It does not
> matter how
> advanced those aliens may be, but the sheer mechanics of moving around six
> billion people would
> defeat the best organiser. Just calculate for one instance the volume and
> weight of a human
> body, multply that by 6 billion and then figure what size cargo ships it
> takes. You cannot pack
> humans like sardines either. Six billion cubic feet. Otherwise take note of
> how many people you
> can pack in a passenger ship, so + food, waste disposal, crew, etc NBLikely.
> It's roughly a
> 1000 people on a standard ocean liner, which makes 6 million of them, give or
> take a crunchie.
> Otherwise imagine talking humans into moving and moving them into ships. Then
> how will they
> survive on a raw, new planet?
> 4: Apart from all that the odds on GOD coming to save us are very, very slim.
> He'it is not the
> interventionist type.
> 5: Apart from all that monism was invented by Abram, who thereby renamed
> himself Abraham. His
> Father was an idol peddler, political jargon for polytheist. And apart from
> all that in other
> research Akhanaton has been identified as Moses, Oedipus and Akhenaton. His
> Father picking up
> on this hebraic strand infiltering Egyptian pharaonic thinking. Even a
> painting showing this
> triple identity has been found. It is only monism that acquired Theology.
> Polytheistic
> religions are not so silly.
> 6: Whenever I get told "to Listen" I know dogma in action.
> 7: On top of all that the dying'reborn god motif is a calendric story with
> four marker
> festivals at the equinoxes and solstices, which has two gods,twins, one for
> summer another for
> winter as a cyclic pattern of growth and decay. Xmas is the reborn god.
> Having now reached the magical number 7 for completion I'll stop.
>
> adrian
>
>
>
> amoram wrote:
> > Very well, my friends!
> > And now listen.
> > The Birth of Jesus Christ is thought to be a mistake because Saint
> > Mattew told of Jesus in Egypt and of events that were before the year
> > 0 in which the Church put his birth.
> > But you have to consider this thing.
> > We have TWO different descriptions of the first years of the Jesus
> > life.
> > In fact Saint Lucas does not tell of the travel in Egypt, but of Jesus
> > that, after 8 days, goes in his Templec and receives his circumcision.
> > Afterwards his family returns to Nazareth and reamins only in that
> > place.
> > So we have 2 different possibilities.
> > If We consider the 3 Kings, the Star, and all the narration of Sain
> > Mattew, it seems a fairy-tale. The desire of this Apostle counted this
> > birth introducing in it the precedent events used to carry Divine
> > Glory on Jesus.
> > So, those who have Faith in this fairy-tale, afterwards affirm the
> > mistake introduced in his birth.
> > We must think that the real <truth> exists only in the Gospel of Saint
> > Lucas.
> > He described of Jesus at 12 year, that begins his work as the Son of
> > His Father...
> > and so... <1000 and not a new 1000> are the 2000 years that, added to
> > this beginning of Jesus, makes exactly the year 2012 that we are
> > speaking about.
>
> > In this case, the calculus that I have done doesn't start from a
> > mistake!
>
> > Romano Amodeo
>
> > On 16 Lug, 19:18, amoram <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >> Here is a FANTASTIC question:
> >> "Was born, Jesus, just to reveal the world's end?"
>
> >> In facts this precise math calculus, made in power:
> >> [(10^5 ×10^100)^1/300]^2 = (10^0.35)^2 = 10^0.122500
> >> "virtually" inserts Jesus into the world, with the most precision at
> >> the 0,1225 power meaning year 0, month 12 and the precise day 25.00 of
> >> the Christmas.
>
> >> And this sequent similar calculus shows in the exponent 2012.122200 of
> >> the power, the year 2012, month 12 and day 22.00 that had been already
> >> predicted by the Mayas, how the end of a complete cycle of the Sun:
>
> >> { (10^10×10)^4
> >> ×[(10^10×10)^8 : 10^3]^10^-2
> >> ×[(10^10×10)^6]^10^-4
> >> ×[(10^10×10)^8 : 10^3]^10^-6
> >> ×(10^10×10^3)^10^-8 } ^2 =
> >> (10^44.85668513)^2 = 10^2012.122200.
> >> NOW I explain - step by step - these two "incredible" calculations.
>
> >> JESUS CHRISTMAS, THROUGH:
> >> [(10^5 ×10^100)^1/300]^2 = (10^0.35)^2 = 10^0.122500
>
> >> 10^5 ×10^100 (in atomic units named Angstrom) is the electric (or
> >> magnetic) unit 10^5, multiplied by the 10^100 that is the Area of 1
> >> m^2, in Angstrom^2, to get the electric (or magnetic) Volume 10^105.
> >> It represents very well, "in transcendental meaning", also the
> >> Communion Man-God, in its "divine" Volume.
> >> The power 1/300, on (10^5 ×10^100), gets 1/3 of the Trinity xyz of
> >> this Volume, how it is referred to 1/100 of the Area's power 100
> >> before introduced, and so we have again a length, in power.
> >> 0.35^2 is ALL THE QUANTITY of the power 10^-35, that is contained in
> >> the Area having the side 0.35 long in length.
> >> Since 10^4 is ALL the reality, and 10^2 is ALL its Area, ALL the flow
> >> in line is the same 10^2 quantity of the area.
> >> So the area 0.35^2 = 0.122500 is also the number representing ALL the
> >> flow in the line of the time, and it inserts Jesus into the world, in
> >> the Christmas day of the 0 year, 12 (December), 25th.
>
> >> You know that Jesus was born 5 years before of the 0 year based on
> >> his birth... but something of "transcendent of the reality" collocated
> >> this date in the "virtual" situation to be in the perfect line with
> >> all the dimensions of the world. Is it happened for the "dogma" (of
> >> the Christian Faith) of an "infallible Pope" ???
>
> >> THE "END OF THE TIME" AS ALL THE MOVEMENT
> >> OF THE 10^3 UNITARY MASSES CONTAINED IN 1 m^3
>
> >> Now, the interesting continues, because if we consider ALL the
> >> possible RUN of a volume 10^3 equal to 1 m^3 and containing all the
> >> unitary quantity of kg, and if we do the same calculus, first of the
> >> power in line and afterwards of the Area, to can know also ALL the
> >> flow of the 10^3 unitary masses, we have just the power 2012.122200
> >> meaning the END already expected by the Mayas. Let us see because.
> >> We have now to control the calculus:
>
> >> { (10^10×10)^4
> >> ×[(10^10×10)^8 : 10^3]^10^-2
> >> ×[(10^10×10)^6]^10^-4
> >> ×[(10^10×10)^8 : 10^3]^10^-6
> >> ×(10^10×10^3)^10^-8 } ^2 =
> >> (10^44.85668513)^2 = 10^2012.122200.
> >> (10^10×10)^4 is equal to 10^11 (that represents the 10^10 angstroms
> >> of 1 m, running in its 10 cycle of the time) at the 4 dimension of
> >> the reality (3 of space and 1 of time). So its result is the power
> >> 10^44.
>
> >> ×[(10^10×10)^8 : 10^3]^10^-2 represents the same 10^11, in the 2^3=8
> >> dimensions of the complex volume having the side 2 formed by the
> >> length from -1 to +1. Afterwards, the resulting 10^88 is divided by
> >> all the 10^3 unitary masses, to count ALL THE RUN 10^85, of these
> >> masses in 10^88 units.
> >> The power 10^-2 of 10^85 gets 10^0.85 and refers (to the unit of the
> >> meter) this quantity that, in itself, is the unit 10^-2 of the Area
> >> 10^2 of expansion.
> >> This happens because the meter is the unitary reference of the
> >> dimension 10^2 (in angstrom), whose unitary reference is 10^-2. So the
> >> result is 10^0.85.
>
> >> ×[(10^10×10)^6]^10^-4 represents the same 10^11 power, that RUNS in
> >> all the 6 direction +x +y +z -x -y -z, of the reality 10^4 that is
> >> present in the total 10^10 Angstrom of 1 m. Naturally, they must be
> >> represented in the unitary part of 10^4, that is 10^-4, so the power
> >> 10^-4 represents this unitary part. This result is 10^0.0066.
>
> >> ×[(10^10×10)^8 : 10^3]^10^-6, at dimension 10^6 (of all the movement
> >> of the reality 10^4, in 10^10 Angstrom of 1 m), represents its unit
> >> 10^-6. The quantity represented is [(10^10×10)^8 : 10^3], the same
> >> 10^85 already seen, that is ALL TE COMPLEX movement 8, of the 10^3
> >> unitary masses of 1 m^3. Therefore the result is 10^0.000085.
>
> >> ×(10^10×10^3)^10^-8 represents at the dimension 10^8 of the light its
> >> unit 10^-8. The quantity represented is the (10^10×10^3) that shows
> >> all the absolute movement, of 1 m (equal to 10^10 angstrom), of all
> >> the 10^3 unitary masses. Therefore 10^0.00000013.
>
> >> The product 10^44 × 10^0.85 × 10^0.0066 × 10^0.000085 × 10^0.00000013
> >> is 10^(44+0.85+0.0066+0.000085+0.00000013) = 10^44.85668513.
>
> >> All this quantity, contained between the parenthesis braces { and },
> >> is elevated to the square, because we need the Area of 10^44.85668513
> >> which has the same number of the flow (since area 10^2 × length 10^2,
> >> gets the reality 10^4). So, finally, { 10^44.85668513 } ^2 =
> >> 10^2012.122500 represents in power the date of the APOCALYPSE of the
> >> year 2012, month 12, day 22.00 (with the absolute precision of 0.00
> >> minutes)
> >> In this way.... has GOD sent Jesus to establish the 0 year, necessary
> >> to can do this perfect calculus of THE END OF THE WORLD ????
> >> My calculus is really perfect one. Let us see it only in the exponents
> >> of the powers.
> >> 44 is all the length 22 +22 of a real RUN (up and down) of the 22
> >> cycles of 10 Volt relative to the most electric tension of
>
> ...
>
> leggi tutto- Nascondi testo citato
>
> - Mostra testo citato -
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Epistemology" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/epistemology?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
