Adrian

Before eating anyone for breakfast, it might be worth seeing what that
person has to say.

Fred

On Sep 6, 11:23 pm, adrf <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Jeepers, first time I can take two potshots at once.
>
> Sam, What you call reality amounts to the physical world or phenomenological. 
> Recent findings
> show that this is an appearance of illusion or a ghostly or astravlevent set. 
> A lot of people
> latch onto a facet or aspect of this world and take it for the complete 
> answer. Diversity is
> variations on a theme one can call archetypes. So you're right but 
> incomplete. Besides as I
> keep on repeating a fact is a PRODUCT of a theory, which is a pattern that 
> serve as a
> logicalised background of a percept or observation. Fact is cognate to 
> feitico, west Indian
> voodoo jargon, which means fetish. So in a catchphrase don't make a fetish of 
> any fact.
> adrian
>
> Sam Carana wrote:
> > Hi Fred,
>
> > Good to hear from you. I believe that diversity is fundamental to
> > reality.
> > Did you read my recent thread on this, at:
> >http://groups.google.com/group/epistemology/browse_frm/thread/5555b41...
>
> > Cheers!
> > Sam Carana
>
> ONTO Fred,
> One of the reputations I acquired is that I eat PRofs for breakfast. I don't 
> know where you got
> the source for your deep uncertainty, but it's neither original nor very 
> deep. It may be
> Schrodinger and all that, the evidence from Quantum Physics that 
> consciousness affects our
> choices, Occultism in some flavours oR theological free will or, again, the 
> uncertainties of
> any future because it still does not exist and all that and all that. I 
> devised around it what
> I call syntology which includes IF in its many flavours, partly derived from 
> Vaihinger's AS IF
> about fictions book, as a necessary precondition of beliefs, the assumptions 
> PROFs never
> mention and which I like hunting down until I discovered there's too dang 
> many of them. Besides
> "what if" as a topic has gone pop and its of course explored by story tellers 
> as well as now
> also those in search of finding macro occassions of the quantal which is also 
> still incomplete,
> but nil desperandum, they may get there yet. NOR do I  pay anything whatever, 
> ever, for
> professorial books of any kind unless they are radically innovative. As an 
> intuitive these
> things come to me as long as ?I? Patiently make like a chicken hatching eggs. 
> If you imagine
> that folks in this group are hungrily waiting for professorial wisdom, be 
> prepared for a
> disappointment of your expectancies which should be lined up alongside 
> beliefs and assumptions.
> I have a triple patch for it, Whatever you desire it may happen, so be 
> careful, anything but
> may happen or nothing happens at all, as a replacement of Quantal and any 
> other statistics. I
> did not think of that as very deep because it is one variation of the law of 
> three. As someone
> once told be be good or careful, to which I replied,'NOPE, just fast enough 
> to get out from
> under when needed.', quite spontaneously without even thinking. So in place 
> Of Apollo and his
> bear pet, another friend suggested I have an octopus as a pet.
> Besides all that epistemologies are maps of the world to stave off 
> uncertainties and play it
> safe, one of those unwarranted social assumptions. They have nothing whatever 
> to do with true
> reality. Epistles are a bit like sermons you know. There ain't such a beast 
> found in Indian or
> Egyptian polytheism; funny that.
>
> adrian
>
>
>
>
>
> > On Sep 6, 9:54 am, "Fred Leavitt" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >> Hi,
>
> >> I just found out about and joined this group. Please consider reading my 
> >> new
> >> book The Deep Uncertainty of Existence. It's about radical skepticism. I've
> >> written several other books (about drugs and about research methodology in
> >> medicine and the behavioral sciences) and all have been well-received, but
> >> this is the only one that makes me proud (and confused).
>
> >> You can read a bit more about The Deep Uncertainty ... at
>
> >>http://www.synergebooks.com/ebook_deepuncertainty.html
> >> <https://email.csueastbay.edu/exchweb/bin/redir.asp?URL=http://www.syn...
> >> ks.com/ebook_deepuncertainty.html> .
>
> >> Cordially,
>
> >> Fred Leavitt
>
> >> Professor, Psychology Department
>
> >> Cal State University
>
> >> Hayward, CA- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -

--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Epistemology" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/epistemology?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to