You are so blind in your small tiny box, that you did not even see I'm
not Georges, so... What to say.

On Sep 22, 3:34 pm, "Timothy Monicken" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Yea *whatever,* Georges...We've met your kind before... always the "food
> critic," having never been "the cook," (professional jealousy?) wholly
> unappreciative of the efforts of others, with misplaced inner anger from
> your "inner child" who has never grown beyond the 30-second-sound-bite *
> mentality*. *Challenge yourself to expand those narrow horizons*.>>Oh, and I
> thought you were just gonna "trash the emails" sent your way. Please, follow
> through with that aggressive disinterest. Benefit from your exposure to our
> postings (or NOT) we are playing a numbers game and are working against a
> perceived deadline to inoculate society from the coming "cusps of
> catastrophe." We don't have time to combat militant ignorance.
>
> So, sorry Georges, you just don't matter that much...we are seeking *
> participants* and do not seek to "convert" anyone. As of NOW, we are going
> to ignore your spurious, acerbical tirades, *until *you can present us with
> one, single, ORIGINAL idea of your own. Thenn, we'll know that at least you
> know what it means to create and then put yourself "out there" in front of a
> discerning public. Good Luck.
>
> On Mon, Sep 22, 2008 at 6:13 AM, einseele <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > > Just don't challege me  & my well-meaning group... if
> > > you want to cross intellectual swords (trust me on this), YOU'LL LOSE,
> > and
> > > lose badly.
>
> > Let's go to the point.
> > Whatever your thought is, do not underestimate those same you want to
> > communicate.
> > Nor start with intellectual battles where you "gonna win". This group
> > is made up trained people in different areas. So skip the arrogance
> > you begin to show, and make a SHORT post with a few ideas, if any. No
> > need to quote another 150 thinkers to give you support. You wont have
> > it.
> > Say it short, clear, silently, and that's it
> > If you think the rest is anxious waiting for your shining invention,
> > ummm, expect nothing.
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Epistemology" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/epistemology?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to