Thanks for your input Adrian. >> I hope you find benefits in the postings. My group is always ingratiated to know that others are "stimulated" from our findings. You can help our outreach by merely *suggesting* to other colleagues & friends that they make their own 'appraisals' of our offerings.>>>Our "cry in the wilderness" may yet be heard by sufficient numbers as to "rock the boat" in American business, when today's bank bailouts, predatory lending, & brand of corporate governance are just bad memories, never to be repeated. Here's hoping for a convivial existence in the future, TJM
On Mon, Sep 22, 2008 at 5:20 PM, adrian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Hi Timothy > > Forget the apology to Einseele, I've yet to see a positive or original > remark from the parrot. > Quite a few groups have such typical hijacker attempts to dominate a group. > The amusing thing > is when certain academics run out of the contents of their tiny box, they > get quite abusive and > academia cultivates a sneering attitude to the unlettered they need to pay > for their > fantasies. It only shows the lack of self control such types have. > > Remember the tale of Lot who turned around to look and the forty odd > versions of Noah and The > flood, wake, sleepers, awake. Not to ignore the children of Lourdes. The > disasters will happen, > precisely because of frozen mindstate of many, They are stuck in a post > disaster reaction told > by Velikowsky which led to a split between conscious and unconscious. In > part it's necessary to > sort one lot from the other. They cannot handle the well established facts > that mind is > inextricably involved with material events. Unfortunately you're in > competition with end of the > world peddlers and the unconscious rejection by trained parrots, also well > recorded. A > reasonably good idea can be extracted from the angry god motif in Genesis. > It leads to all this > angry violent suppression, punishments and denials. They operate that "If > we don't talk about > it, it will go away", haha. It's actually Akhenaton being pissed off with > being ignored by the > priesthood, so history repeats itself. It's actually ironic that the > remnants of a previous > disaster affect the impact of the next one. The Jehovah's witnesses. > Mormons, send out their > missionaries to get toughened up by the abuse. > > I'd like some more precise and fuller details of your mantra and details of > the empowerment as > well as the scenario. It does not bother me too much If I get swept along > with the tsunami or > avalanche. You can extract my email from the post. I've lost the url, etc. > > adrian. > > > > > Timothy Monicken wrote: > > I guess I owe an apology to Ol' Georges, as I got you two "mixed up" My > > last post was meant for you... I'll do you the professional courtesy of > > a direct chat to set you straight on a few critical ideas, just say the > > word. The important thing for all to remember is WE DON'T CARE if you > > choose to follow our postings or not. This is a simple "outreach" not a > > "revival meeting." > > > > Trust me when I say that Kurzweil (et.al <http://et.al>.) are correct in > > their time-line assessments of the exponential "technological curve!!!" > > /THAT/ IS WHY, because of our sense of jurispudence, that we are trying > > to do all the "dues" - *due diligence, due notice, due process, etc.* > > *This /outreach /is no picnic for us...* and, in fact, we believe it to > > be a certainly that we are not the only group with a viable model out > > there, but /unlike/ us, these groups remain silent - "as tight-lipped as > > sphincters in ice water," /despite/ that by NOT being /sufficiently/ > > transparent about *intentionalities*, it will only serve to view our > > industry with suspicion & distrust. > > >>We aim to create a proper liason or "engagement" with the public, so > > that most of the initial applications from the first prototypes /have/ > > been given "the nodd" from the majority of consumers and not just thrust > > upon them. Key word for us ( our "mantra") IS *empowerment!* For those > > who are angered by our "intrusion," (Well, SO-O-O-O-O-O-ry!) *just > > ignore us! *That's simple enough to do, right??? For all we care, go > > ahead & bury your heads in the sand... you can rationalize that we're > > "just a bunch of sensationalist, alarmist twits that love to "borrow > > trouble." You can lead a horse to water... "knee-deep in a river, an' > > dyin' of thirst. *_Whatever_.* Indignant? - Hell, yes! Why shouldn't we > > be??? > > > > On Mon, Sep 22, 2008 at 6:13 AM, einseele <[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>> wrote: > > > > > > > Just don't challege me & my well-meaning group... if > > > you want to cross intellectual swords (trust me on this), YOU'LL > > LOSE, and > > > lose badly. > > > > Let's go to the point. > > Whatever your thought is, do not underestimate those same you want to > > communicate. > > Nor start with intellectual battles where you "gonna win". This group > > is made up trained people in different areas. So skip the arrogance > > you begin to show, and make a SHORT post with a few ideas, if any. No > > need to quote another 150 thinkers to give you support. You wont have > > it. > > Say it short, clear, silently, and that's it > > If you think the rest is anxious waiting for your shining invention, > > ummm, expect nothing. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Epistemology" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/epistemology?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
