Hi Timothy Forget the apology to Einseele, I've yet to see a positive or original remark from the parrot. Quite a few groups have such typical hijacker attempts to dominate a group. The amusing thing is when certain academics run out of the contents of their tiny box, they get quite abusive and academia cultivates a sneering attitude to the unlettered they need to pay for their fantasies. It only shows the lack of self control such types have.
Remember the tale of Lot who turned around to look and the forty odd versions of Noah and The flood, wake, sleepers, awake. Not to ignore the children of Lourdes. The disasters will happen, precisely because of frozen mindstate of many, They are stuck in a post disaster reaction told by Velikowsky which led to a split between conscious and unconscious. In part it's necessary to sort one lot from the other. They cannot handle the well established facts that mind is inextricably involved with material events. Unfortunately you're in competition with end of the world peddlers and the unconscious rejection by trained parrots, also well recorded. A reasonably good idea can be extracted from the angry god motif in Genesis. It leads to all this angry violent suppression, punishments and denials. They operate that "If we don't talk about it, it will go away", haha. It's actually Akhenaton being pissed off with being ignored by the priesthood, so history repeats itself. It's actually ironic that the remnants of a previous disaster affect the impact of the next one. The Jehovah's witnesses. Mormons, send out their missionaries to get toughened up by the abuse. I'd like some more precise and fuller details of your mantra and details of the empowerment as well as the scenario. It does not bother me too much If I get swept along with the tsunami or avalanche. You can extract my email from the post. I've lost the url, etc. adrian. Timothy Monicken wrote: > I guess I owe an apology to Ol' Georges, as I got you two "mixed up" My > last post was meant for you... I'll do you the professional courtesy of > a direct chat to set you straight on a few critical ideas, just say the > word. The important thing for all to remember is WE DON'T CARE if you > choose to follow our postings or not. This is a simple "outreach" not a > "revival meeting." > > Trust me when I say that Kurzweil (et.al <http://et.al>.) are correct in > their time-line assessments of the exponential "technological curve!!!" > /THAT/ IS WHY, because of our sense of jurispudence, that we are trying > to do all the "dues" - *due diligence, due notice, due process, etc.* > *This /outreach /is no picnic for us...* and, in fact, we believe it to > be a certainly that we are not the only group with a viable model out > there, but /unlike/ us, these groups remain silent - "as tight-lipped as > sphincters in ice water," /despite/ that by NOT being /sufficiently/ > transparent about *intentionalities*, it will only serve to view our > industry with suspicion & distrust. > >>We aim to create a proper liason or "engagement" with the public, so > that most of the initial applications from the first prototypes /have/ > been given "the nodd" from the majority of consumers and not just thrust > upon them. Key word for us ( our "mantra") IS *empowerment!* For those > who are angered by our "intrusion," (Well, SO-O-O-O-O-O-ry!) *just > ignore us! *That's simple enough to do, right??? For all we care, go > ahead & bury your heads in the sand... you can rationalize that we're > "just a bunch of sensationalist, alarmist twits that love to "borrow > trouble." You can lead a horse to water... "knee-deep in a river, an' > dyin' of thirst. *_Whatever_.* Indignant? - Hell, yes! Why shouldn't we > be??? > > On Mon, Sep 22, 2008 at 6:13 AM, einseele <[EMAIL PROTECTED] > <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>> wrote: > > > > Just don't challege me & my well-meaning group... if > > you want to cross intellectual swords (trust me on this), YOU'LL > LOSE, and > > lose badly. > > Let's go to the point. > Whatever your thought is, do not underestimate those same you want to > communicate. > Nor start with intellectual battles where you "gonna win". This group > is made up trained people in different areas. So skip the arrogance > you begin to show, and make a SHORT post with a few ideas, if any. No > need to quote another 150 thinkers to give you support. You wont have > it. > Say it short, clear, silently, and that's it > If you think the rest is anxious waiting for your shining invention, > ummm, expect nothing. > > > > > > --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Epistemology" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/epistemology?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
