Okay, sorry, it read to me like that. still does. Yes, politics has always worked like that. It promises us a safe life and then invents a bugaboo to threaten us to make us ask for more protection from dangers. Bush is behaving exactly like a pope who behaves exactly like roman emperors, etc blahh.
""" Of course the people don't want war... That is understood. But... it's always a simple matter to drag the people along whether it's a democracy, a fascist dictatorship, a parliament, or a communist dictatorship. Voice or no voice, the people can always be brought to the bidding of the leaders. That is easy. All you have to do is tell them they are being attacked, and denounce the pacifists for lack of patriotism and exposing the country to danger. It works the same in any country. Hermann Goering at the Nuremberg trials, 1946 from Nuremberg Diary, by G. M. Gilbert. What else is new? I am not stuck in a hole, I am being stuck in a hole, that's different. adrian chazwin wrote: > > > On Sep 25, 3:05 pm, adrian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> You're forgiven for not understanding me. I ain't patriotic AT ALL. >> I think of consequences. >> >> adrian > > Hello? I did not say that you were patriotic: I was drawing an > analogy. > I shall spell it out. Bush is saying either accept the plan or we are > doomed to a worse fate, no alternative, do or die. It is the way right > wing politics has always worked. Exterminate the Jews, or be ruled by > them; attack Iraq or accept international domination of Islam. > It is a game. > I am saying that there are many other ways to solve this problem that > would not reward the sharks, and not penalise the ordinary taxpayer. > >> chazwin wrote: >>> You seem to be stuck in the same hole as is characterised by the "You >>> are a Patriot OR you are Anti-war" stance that Bush and his cronies >>> has imposed on the debacle in Iraq. >>> Here you are stuck in thinking either $700bill handout to the rich OR >>> depression. This is not the case - there might be other alternatives. >>> If you think it possible that to be patriotic and against the war then >>> your imagination might find an alternative to stealing off the people >>> to help the sharks. >>> On Sep 25, 10:32 am, adrian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >>>> BUT, if the market crashes their money deflates too? >>>> Do they plan a repeat of the 1929 Kennedy trick, to sit on the money until >>>> the market collapses >>>> and then go on a buying spree? If so it's part of the takeover of the >>>> world? >>>> adrian >>>> chazwin wrote: >>>>> The $700billion Swindle >>>>> Over the last few years money markets have been engaged in a feeding >>>>> frenzy of massive profits and unjustified and bloated bonuses. This >>>>> greedy unrestrained scrabbling for bucks has finally brought the >>>>> Western economy to its knees. >>>>> The solution is theft. Bush and his friends are now cooking up a a >>>>> cunning plan to reward this bad behaviour. He is now planning to steal >>>>> 700billion dollars from the tax payers of the USA to hand out to all >>>>> his best buddies in the financial markets. >>>>> The strategy Bush is using is the same as employed in his invasion of >>>>> Iraq - keep the public scared and set the agenda for creating the fear >>>>> and providing the "solution". >>>>> Bad behaviour that is rewarded always leads to more bad behaviour, as >>>>> a teacher I know this much. > > > --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Epistemology" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/epistemology?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
