Is there a possibility to develop a science not axiomatic? Galileo laid the foundation for the physics that can be written via mathematics. But axiomatic systems are older than that such as Geometry developed by Greeks.
> Since Galileo and Descartes the whole science is axiomatic > and works exactly like that. On Oct 29, 7:16 pm, Georges Metanomski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > --- On Wed, 10/29/08, Joseph Polanik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > you (Georges) have invented a rule that your viewpoint can only be challenged > from inside itself. > =============== > G: > This is not to discuss with Joe, nor to prevent him from > making a priceless ass of himself, but to keep the record > straight for people who could get muddled by his lies and > inanities. > > What I said is that axiomatic systems are by definition falsifiable by facts > through inductive inference via > their own theorems. > > Aether axiom has been falsified by MM fact by entirely > internal induction via its own theorems. > > Since Galileo and Descartes the whole science is axiomatic > and works exactly like that. > > Georges. > =============== > =============== --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Epistemology" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/epistemology?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
