ornamentalmind wrote:
> http://www.onelook.com/?w=gnosiology&ls=a
YEP> that's my definition, they bought it. There was not one when I wrote,
early this morning. I
might as well have written "the politics" but forbore. It says "from a user.
adrian
>
> On Nov 17, 12:54 pm, adrian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> 1: Georges did not invent it, Heidegger coined Intentionality to cover that.
>> 2: Onelook does not have a definition for gnosiology, I've just provided
>> one, it will be curious to
>> see whether they'll bite.
>>
>> adrian
>>
>>
>>
>> ornamentalmind wrote:
>>> "... We all tend to have viewpoints that require understanding. ..." -
>>> archytas
>>> Yes, and not just one type of 'understanding', no? I've recently
>>> learned the term gnosiology. It seems to be applicable.
>>> On Nov 7, 7:29 am, archytas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>>> I don't go with science as ultimately axiomatic. We all tend to have
>>>> viewpoints that require understanding. This is a challenge of radical
>>>> interpretation - one Donaldson addressed at length, still leaving us
>>>> with compassion for others and pretty rigorous evidence in
>>>> evaluation. This needs to be two-way and I have lost tolerance for
>>>> village idiots taking a superior, patronising view from the irony of
>>>> idiocy. Joe's plays do not seem out of place to me.
>>>> On 29 Oct, 13:16, Georges Metanomski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>>>> --- On Wed, 10/29/08, Joseph Polanik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>>>> you (Georges) have invented a rule that your viewpoint can only be
>>>>> challenged from inside itself.
>>>>> ===============
>>>>> G:
>>>>> This is not to discuss with Joe, nor to prevent him from
>>>>> making a priceless ass of himself, but to keep the record
>>>>> straight for people who could get muddled by his lies and
>>>>> inanities.
>>>>> What I said is that axiomatic systems are by definition falsifiable by
>>>>> facts through inductive inference via
>>>>> their own theorems.
>>>>> Aether axiom has been falsified by MM fact by entirely
>>>>> internal induction via its own theorems.
>>>>> Since Galileo and Descartes the whole science is axiomatic
>>>>> and works exactly like that.
>>>>> Georges.
>>>>> ===============
>>>>> ===============- Hide quoted text -
>>>> - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text -
>> - Show quoted text -
> >
>
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Epistemology" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/epistemology?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
