Did you see the article in Scientific American? Big Bang or Big Bounce?: New Theory on the Universe's Birth http://www.sciam.com/article.cfm?id=big-bang-or-big-bounce
Cheers! Sam Carana On Nov 18, 12:46 pm, "Henry Kroll" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > If you like esoteria here is one for you: > > *Black diamonds from space indicate age of universe!** *** > > *If nobody was there to see it, was there a Big Bang? The whole idea that > such a titanic explosion could come from a single point the size smaller > than a Planck length 10E-35 meter and then billions of years later we are > here to explain it may be a creationest manifestation of reality. * > > *"The instant of creation remains unexplained." ---Professor Allan Guth of > MIT* > > *"The actual point of creation lies outside the scope of present day known > physics." ---Stephan Hawking * > > *Can science verify a consciousness? Are there watchers who protect us from > ourselves or is it quantum entanglement? Are we uncouscously shareing > quantum entanglement? Is there a God consciousness field responsible for > creation? "Religion without science is blind." What if we could acieve > consciousness enlightment individually? * > > *I am still not convinced that there was a big bang for a number of reasons. > The newest space telescopes are now seeing galaxies out to 14 billion light > years and they seem to be speeding away from us at increasing velocities > nearing the speed of light. For all we know photons might rund down and > shift to the red after traveling 14-billion light years. We just don't know. > The Big Bang theory is probably a religious manifestation of reality. * > > In fact, the Big Bang theory was invented by the Catholic Church. "What!" > you say. "I thought Edwin Hubble invented the Big Bang theory." Well, that's > not quite correct. A Catholic monk, George Lemaitre, first proposed the Big > Bang theory in 1927. American, Edwin Hubble published the idea in 1929 two > years after the Catholic Church grabbed onto the idea. It was Hubble that > attached the mathematics to the idea in an attempt to make sense of it. The > Catholics invented the idea to unite the Biblical idea of creation with > science at the time. You can't make something out of nothing. The > fundamental laws of physics specifically state this of in order to explain > the creation of all matter in the universe in an instant from an > infinitesimally-small, microscopic point you have to have an event with > infinite energy. The Catholic Church endorsed the Big Bang Theory because it > fit the Biblical creation paradigm, that there is an infinite God or YHWH. > > After Hubble published the theory the Church heralded it as proof that the > bible was scientifically accurate and "Divine Truth." Scholars have been > debating the validity of this theory for decades. > > *BIG BANG DOES NOT CONTRADICT CREATION* > > If the Big Bang theory is a reality, according to my reasoning it does not > contradict the Biblical six-day creation theory. Say for example, if God > were going to set off a firecracker big enough to create everything he would > need at lease a couple days head-start to get his spaceship up to light > speed before it went off. This might keep him ahead of the blast just far > enough to survive because he would be traveling at 99.9999 percent the speed > of light and his time would be slowed down to nothing. > > Our present knowledge of physics dictates that 12 to 13 billion years will > have passed while God traveling near the speed of light only experienced a > time elapse of three days. He would have had to set the charge just right to > create third dimensional matter. One way of doing this would be to create > lots of ORME atoms first which he could control with his brain waves. Then > he would use these particles to transmute the necessary elements to support > life in all it various forms. > > During the 12 to 14 billion years of time matter was supposed to have > expanded, destroying and recreated again into its present state God would > have had to regulate this process with brain waves. It would take God > another day or so to slow down from light speed, find a suitable world or > worlds, and push them into the correct orbits to support life. Then he > would have to find a moon to regulate the life cycles and get somebody to > man it. Hence "The Man in The Moon." Then he would have to take off again to > put a few billion more worlds into orbits everywhere. Finally on the sixth > day he would come back to find a world teeming with life (dinosaurs) of > every description. Then he would have to put hunters down there with big > guns to kill off the dinosaurs. > > The oxygen levels would have to be high enough to support animal life so > obviously he would have to put in orbit near a white dwarf star so that the > phytoplankton and diatoms would do their job of mopping up the CO2 releasing > oxygen for so-called higher life forms to breathe. God would then have to > kill off most of the animal life that is harmful to man and then create the > first man to have dominion over what he created. The easiest and most cost > effective way to do this is to divert a meteor into the Earth. Obviously, > God had lots of deck-hands or helpers (Angels) to do this. > > By this time, advanced civilizations throughout the Universe and planets in > other galaxies would have had a much longer time to evolve and be capable of > space travel. They were very interested in Earth because it had such a high > pressure atmosphere that was 1/3 CO2, the gas necessary for the creation of > all life, carbon being the perfect molecule to bond cell membranes. The > great pyramid is a model of a carbon molecule. They would have come to earth > many times in the past to help mankind evolve. The latest data shows that > man's DNA is a composite of 22 different alien species. We have lots of > relatives! > > They came down here and took some chimpanzee DNA, mixed in 22 of their own > specie and turned them loose to see if they would kill each other off. This > was done to eliminate a galactic war. We do the fighting why they stand back > and bet on the contestants. > > Einstein, being a member of the Christian-Jewish community was forced to go > along with the Big Bang theory but he had his reservations. He wondered > where the energy came from in the first place. There was no way he could > explain an infinitely small space creating enough energy to make everything. > Then when you get into expansion theory, science turns into science fiction. > > There is no way mankind can advance when he lets religion dictate what is > real and not real. Mankind will never discover the true meaning of God when > he forces his own ideas upon reality. If he is allowed to persist in this > fruitless endeavor he will never discover the truth. > > So, when did time begin? In Scientific American May 2004 issue: "Science > does not have a conclusive answer yet, but at least two potentially testable > theories plausibly hold that the universe-and therefore time-existed well > before the "big bang" (I don't think there was one). If either scenario is > right, the cosmos has always been in existence and, even if it re-collapses > one day, it will never end." > > *When will our galaxy collide with Andromeda?*** > > "Current measurements suggest that, I about 3-billion years, the Milky Way > and Andromeda may collide." –John Dubendki Hayden Planetarium University of > Toronto, Canada. This is more evidence that there is no such thing as a big > bang forcing the universe to expand. Galaxies wouldn't be colliding if they > are getting further apart! > > If the Universe is expanding then why are galaxies colliding? Shouldn't they > be getting further apart? The huge number of colliding galaxies throw > another monkey wrench into the big bang theory. Einstein wasn't completely > convinced that there is such a thing as a big bang but he went along with it > to placate the status quo. To read more of Einstein's ideas on this subject > and others read my book, Cosmological Ice > Ages.www.GuardDogBooks.com<http://www.guarddogbooks.com/>&www.AlaskaPublishing.com<http://www.alaskapublishing.com/> > > *Then there is the fact that as we (our sun) travels through space while > orbiting the galaxy we encounter very old red dwarf stars. These are burn't > out crisps so old that they could possibly be left over from prevous big > bangs. One of these stars is Banard's Star 5.88 light years to the northwest > coming toward us at 14.5 kilometers per second.* > > *All elements decay only it take any billions of years for uranium to turn > into lead. All the heavy elements above iron are created in stellar > explosions. The number of heavy elements on the surface of the Earth > convinces me that the cosmos is very very old. First of all a star has to > evolve and cook for billions of years until it burns off all the hydrogen. > Then the helium starts to burn and finally after billions more years it will > swell up into a giant red or shrink down into a white dwarf. Sometimes the > explosion is so violent that the star will shrink down into a neutron star > or even a black hole. All this takes time—impossible measures of time. If we > knew more we could determine the age of any planet by the carious > compositions of elements in the crust. A younger planet would have less time > to collect heavy elements.* > > *They built the Panama Canal with black diamonds. The cutting tools used to > slice through the rock were made of black diamonds. Large black diamonds can > only come from space. A red dwarf is too hot to make black diamonds and > stars are definitely too hot so the only other explanation is that they came > from black dwarfs. * > > *The simple fact that black diamonds from space exist is partial proof that > black dwarfs exist. If black dwarfs are a reality then the universe is tens > of billions of years older than present estimates—possibly eternal.* > > *Stars smaller than our Sun would eventually after tens of billions of years > use up all their fuel. Carbon bubbling away in the left over hydrogen and > nitrogen gas for billions of years formed large diamond crystals one meter > in diameter. Such large diamonds could only have formed under the heat and > pressure of a burnt out star known as a black ... > > read more » --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Epistemology" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/epistemology?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
