On Mar 26, 7:50 am, "[email protected]" <[email protected]> wrote: > On Mar 26, 1:33 am, Craig Weinberg <[email protected]> wrote: > > That seems to be the cosmology of the moment, > and it may make quantum equations work out correctly, > but it has no explanatory power. > What> created the possibility of 'fluctuations' in a vacuum? > > I think that eventually we will find that the fluctuations > are in the instruments we use to take measurements themselves > and not external to matter. > Quantum is actually rhythmic qualia - lowest level common > sense of > matter. > Space and time are a true void, sense and motive are primordial. > > > Craig > > =======. > 1 > What created the possibility of 'fluctuations' in a vacuum? > The explainable power of fluctuation in vacuum is Electron.
If there is even the hint of a possibility of an electron, then you have no perfect vacuum. > The fluctuations are not external to matter > ( as in Newtonian physics ) but depends on own internal > impulse of electron : h*=h/pi ( Quantum physics). That would agree with what I'm saying then. It's not vacuum that is primordial, but electron pulse (and its sensorimotive correlate). > 2 > Which sense and motive are primordial? > The sense and motive to escape the infinite/eternal > homogeneous and monotony vacuum are primordial. You could look it it that way - that the singularity diffracts to break the suffocation of monotony, but that presupposes some kind of sense - a feeling that the homogeneity of of the vacuum is in some way undesirable and that there is a way to satisfy this feeling (on close the opened sensorimotive circuit) through some kind of effort or motive to transcend the primordial emptiness. The assumption of primordial vacuum is a natural enough starting point for Occidental thinking (because of the objective-subjective symmetry of the cosmos, philosophy of mind has swung from the native (subject biased) Eastern view to the post-Enlightenment Western (object biased) reformation. In reality, I think it's an arbitrary starting point for cosmology, and is more likely to have begun with a singularity of 'everythingness' which has, through self diffraction, maintained an essential continuity in spite of an existential fragmentation. The interference pattern of those two sense channels (interiority and exterioty) give rise to perceptual-relativistic inertial frames which are nested within each other literally through space and scale, and figuratively through significance (increasing perceptual depth and richness indicates increasing reconstitution of primordial wholeness...it is subtractive and reverse temporal, negentropic). Craig > ===. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Epistemology" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/epistemology?hl=en.
