On Mar 24, 4:12 am, "[email protected]" <[email protected]> wrote: > Once upon a time, 14 - 20 billions years ago, all matter > (all elementary particles and all quarks and > their girlfriends- antiparticles and antiquarks, > all kinds of waves: electromagnetic, gravitational, > muons… gluons field ….. etc.) – were assembled in a “single point”.
Since spacetime is ultimately the same thing, the idea of everything being a single point (having zero space) also means there was no time. No time means the same thing as all time, which makes sense since there is no frame of reference outside of the singularity with which to establish any kind of sequence. What I think this *must* mean is that the singularity is not an event that happened x billions of years ago, rather it is an event which never happened but which is perpetually projected ever further backwards. As this happens, space expansion happens within the singularity from within rather than the singularity expanding into an infinite void. Such a void cannot exist outside of the singularity since it is the singularity itself which is creating space and time, as well as causality and sequence itself. I call this the 'Big Diffraction', as it is no more an expansion of matter into space as it is an ingression of non-matter into the singularity. Instead of a cosmology which imagines a hypothetical explosion at the dawn of time as viewed from a distance by a generic voyeur, we must recognize that this is an impossible perspective as the singularity cannot possibly have an exterior. It is not merely an innocent way of conceiving a physical event, but actually hopelessly confuses the reality of the thing. There was no explosion and no expansion. Those are reverse engineered narratives based upon our own scales of time, space, density, etc. At the 'time' of the actual event, concepts like intensity and magnitude would be inconceivable as they had literally not been invented yet. A singularity has no measure or frame of reference, it is boundary-less in every sense, as it would have to be in order to contain the entire cosmos condensed to a single point-event. Within that point, must be all the potential for all times and places as well as all mass-energy. > It means that all information also was assembled in a "single point". Not necessarily. Not if information isn't 'real'. I think information is subjective. It arises through the enactment of timespace (the ingression of the vacuum into the singularity) as sensorimotive experience which accumulates as significance. > And then after big bang all particles flew in different sides. > # > Suppose, that every particle is the owner of some information. > Then it was impossible to create Intellect Existence by the chance > during as short time as 14 billions years after ‘big bang’. > The intelligence could have never appeared by the chances > according to Theory of Probability (as per the infinite monkey > theorem ). Intelligence is everywhere. Just not human intelligence. Craig -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Epistemology" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/epistemology?hl=en.
