On Mar 26, 2:52 pm, Craig Weinberg <[email protected]> wrote: > On Mar 26, 7:50 am, "[email protected]" <[email protected]> > wrote: > > > > > > > On Mar 26, 1:33 am, Craig Weinberg <[email protected]> wrote: > > > That seems to be the cosmology of the moment, > > and it may make quantum equations work out correctly, > > but it has no explanatory power. > > What> created the possibility of 'fluctuations' in a vacuum? > > > I think that eventually we will find that the fluctuations > > are in the instruments we use to take measurements themselves > > and not external to matter. > > Quantum is actually rhythmic qualia - lowest level common > sense of > > matter. > > Space and time are a true void, sense and motive are primordial. > > > > Craig > > > =======. > > 1 > > What created the possibility of 'fluctuations' in a vacuum? > > The explainable power of fluctuation in vacuum is Electron. > > If there is even the hint of a possibility of an electron, then you > have no perfect vacuum. > > > The fluctuations are not external to matter > > ( as in Newtonian physics ) but depends on own internal > > impulse of electron : h*=h/pi ( Quantum physics). > > That would agree with what I'm saying then. It's not vacuum that is > primordial, but electron pulse (and its sensorimotive correlate). > > > 2 > > Which sense and motive are primordial? > > The sense and motive to escape the infinite/eternal > > homogeneous and monotony vacuum are primordial. > > You could look it it that way - that the singularity diffracts to > break the suffocation of monotony, but that presupposes some kind of > sense - a feeling that the homogeneity of of the vacuum is in some way > undesirable and that there is a way to satisfy this feeling (on close > the opened sensorimotive circuit) through some kind of effort or > motive to transcend the primordial emptiness. > > The assumption of primordial vacuum is a natural enough starting point > for Occidental thinking (because of the objective-subjective symmetry > of the cosmos, philosophy of mind has swung from the native (subject > biased) Eastern view to the post-Enlightenment Western (object biased) > reformation. In reality, I think it's an arbitrary starting point for > cosmology, and is more likely to have begun with a singularity of > 'everythingness' which has, through self diffraction, maintained an > essential continuity in spite of an existential fragmentation. The > interference pattern of those two sense channels (interiority and > exterioty) give rise to perceptual-relativistic inertial frames which > are nested within each other literally through space and scale, and > figuratively through significance (increasing perceptual depth and > richness indicates increasing reconstitution of primordial > wholeness...it is subtractive and reverse temporal, negentropic). > > Craig > > > > > ===.- Hide quoted text - > A singularity of your 'everythingness' is electron. The richness of material world begun from fluctuation - - polarization of primordial vacuum . ==.
-- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Epistemology" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/epistemology?hl=en.
