ED,Dan, may be the VAA would help on this too, I'm sure there are a 
few members there that own coupes, me for one Syd for another.


--- In [email protected], "Dan Hall" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Ed,
> I think you've got something good here that just may have a chance 
to succeed with our friends in the FAA !!!
> 
> What do you think our best shot is at giving this a go?    
> 
> Dan Hall
> N3968H
> Region 7
> @ CNO in SoCal
>   ----- Original Message ----- 
>   From: Ed Burkhead 
>   To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ; 'efy' 
>   Sent: Thursday, January 03, 2008 6:39 PM
>   Subject: RE: [ercoupe-flyin] Worthy cause for LSA pilots
> 
> 
>   An hour ago I wrote:
>   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>   What I'd like to do would be to get an official document from the 
FAA saying that any aircraft whose airworthiness certificate never 
allowed a gross weight higher than 1320 lb. (600 Kg.) is eligible as 
an LSA and that no other documents override this.  This will bring in 
a bunch of Coupes for which people never changed the airworthiness 
certificate.
>   <<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<
> 
>   I've added a new thought.  I still think the FAA will not, for 
anything, change the gross weight limit.  But, in addition to what 
I've written above, I'd suggest we also try for a change in the 
actual regulation stating that:
> 
>   Whereas a certificated airplane (note that word is 
NOT "certified") is fully regulated in its structure, performance, 
maintenance and condition.  If it is eligible under its type 
certificate at a gross weight not exceeding 1320 lb. (600 Kg.), it 
may revert to that model and gross weight limit even if it has, at 
some time previously, been certificated at a higher gross weight.
> 
>   Note that this may get through the Feds.  It is still a 
regulation change but it's small enough, is tightly restricted by the 
word certificated, and is loosening the regulation, not tightening 
it.  They may be able to do the change without an NPRM like they did 
with the repositionable landing gear on the amphibians.
> 
>   Also, this might be claimed to affect a similar number of planes 
to the amphibians for whom they have made a similar small regulation 
change.
> 
>   The downside is that while the amphibian change fosters new 
manufacturing, our change does not.
> 
>   Ed
> 
> 
>    
> 
>   _____________________________________________________________
>   Click for an accredited Life Experience Degree in 5 days, make up 
to $150k.
> 
> 
> 
> --------------------------------------------------------------------
----------
> 
> 
>   No virus found in this incoming message.
>   Checked by AVG Free Edition. 
>   Version: 7.5.516 / Virus Database: 269.17.13/1208 - Release Date: 
1/3/2008 3:52 PM
>


Reply via email to