----[Please read http://ercoupers.com/disclaimer.htm before following any advice in this forum.]----
After reading all the replies I Have come to this conclusion.. We need to go back to the barnstorming days and hang the FAA out to dry. There are a lot of other governmental agencys that need the same thing. Jim Phelps 2749H ----- Original Message ----- From: "Paul M. Anton" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Tom Laird-McConnell" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <[email protected]> Sent: Monday, May 05, 2003 8:12 PM Subject: Re: [COUPERS-TECH] Cleveland brakes on a pre-813 serial number 415C (FSDO problems) > ----[Please read http://ercoupers.com/disclaimer.htm before following any advice in this forum.]---- > > > Hi Tom: > > A couple of questions. > > Did you have an approved 337 to submit as acceptable data? > > Did you submit the 337 asking for an approval for an existing modification, > or did you submit it as if it hadn't been modified yet? > > I understand that asking for approval after > the modification has been carried out enrages the FSDO. > > Is your I.A. working through Jim Irwin? In the past he has seemed > reasonable. I have > a couple of 337's pending myself, now I'm wondering if I dare call him to > follow up. :-( > > If the Seattle FSDO is a dead end, I'd call John Wright Jr. and see if he > could run it through > his FSDO. He has run a lot of Ercoupe 337s through and they know him very > well. You can > have a 337 approved at any FSDO. > > Good luck > > Paul > NC2273H > Spanaway S44 > > ========================================================================== == == > To leave this forum go to: http://ercoupers.com/lists.htm > Search the archives on http://escribe.com/aviation/coupers-tech/ > > > ========================================================================== ==== To leave this forum go to: http://ercoupers.com/lists.htm Search the archives on http://escribe.com/aviation/coupers-tech/
<<attachment: winmail.dat>>
