Larry.

As already mentioned, the C-85 engine is a legal engine for a 415-C. This is 
stated in the Type certificate of the airplane.
So having a C-85 in front keeps the 415-C a 415-C.

Using the O-200 crankshaft in a C-85 with the STC changes the ENGINE, not the 
aircraft!
Per STC, the C-85 will be tuned to produce the 85 hp within its limits and 
therefore no changes are done in engine installation , power output or anything 
else that could affect the airframe. You are still running a C-85 in front. 
Most likely in it's original engine case. 

This is a typical example how complicated regulations can stir confusion. 
Instead of just allowing all 415 Ercoupes to be flown as a sport pilot plane, 
when adhering to the new gross weight limit,  we are forced to explain the 
rules to the rule makers.

Hartmut









  ----- Original Message ----- 
  From: larry_maden 
  To: [email protected] 
  Sent: Sunday, October 21, 2007 7:29 PM
  Subject: [ercoupe-tech] C-85 with O-200 crankshaft and the FAA


  I have been a lurker on this group for almost a year now and have 
  been very impressed with the wisdom often imparted here.

  A friend of mine has been restoring a crashed 415c Ercoupe for 
  several months now and is very nearly finished with the project. The 
  aircraft
  has a C-85 engine and has an O-200 crankshaft installed. From my 
  readings on this group, the aircraft remains a 415c as there is no 
  paper trail of conversion to a 415cd or 415d aircraft. All the stc's 
  for the installation of the O-200 are present. 

  Unfortunately, being an extremely thorough person, he invited the 
  local FAA airworthiness inspectors to insure that they agreed the 
  aircraft was indeed a 415c. Two inspectors came to his shop to 
  examine the plane and review the paperwork. The two inspectors 
  disagreed , one inspector who is the titular LSA expert in the FAA 
  airworthiness division, believed the aircraft was indeed a 415c. The 
  other inspector, however, adamantly stated that a C-85 engine made 
  the aircraft a 415cd and that the O-200 conversion made it a D model, 
  end of debate. 

  I know that the O-200 issue has been discussed previously on this 
  site, and concensus was that the conversion did not change the 
  aircraft from a 415c. I wonder anyone in this group, especially ones 
  with experience in dealing with the FAA have any advice on achieving 
  a positive outcome in this case? Yes, I was hoping to buy the 
  airplane as an LSA. 

  Thanks for your help.

  Larry Maden



   

Reply via email to