When I first read this post I figured it was a Halloween thing.  "We're from 
the FAA and we're here to help.  Trick or Treat!"  But I guess it's 
unfortunately real.  Okay, I know some have responded and everyone calls the 
first guy correct and second incorrect, but the lesson here is DO NOT CALL THE 
FAA IN FOR ANYTHING unless they are delivering your lottery winnings, and even 
then just meet them at the Burger King for the transaction.  They are not your 
friend, and generally most of the new breed will not usually help unless you've 
developed a good working relationship.  Their ranks have swollen, filled with 
political hacks who just need to justify their jobs, as is evident by this 
incident.  

Number 1, an LSA "specialist" has no business there, the Ercoupe is a fully 
certificated aircraft and the LSA regs are pretty straight forward.  If you 
can't read, ask a teacher.  Number 2, the second inspector didn't need to be 
there because he's obviously a dimwit.  If the O-200 crank was installed with 
the STC, it doesn't change the engine displacement.  Further, there just may be 
an STC to convert a C or CD to an O-200.  The problem now is that #2 can't 
justify his employment and will do everything short of saying "I was mistaken" 
to keep the paycheck coming.  Your friend deserves the hassle he's gotten 
himself into.

Remember the FAA's slogan "We're Not Happy Until You're Not Happy."  And yes, 
I'll sign my name to this.  I believe an idiot has no business working within a 
regulatory body.

Al DeMarzo
Visit the Ercoupe Swap Page - Free and Easy
http://www.ercoupeowners.com/swap/swapbook.htm


----- Original Message ----- 
  From: larry_maden 
  To: [email protected] 
  Sent: Sunday, October 21, 2007 12:29 PM
  Subject: [ercoupe-tech] C-85 with O-200 crankshaft and the FAA


  I have been a lurker on this group for almost a year now and have 
  been very impressed with the wisdom often imparted here.

  A friend of mine has been restoring a crashed 415c Ercoupe for 
  several months now and is very nearly finished with the project. The 
  aircraft
  has a C-85 engine and has an O-200 crankshaft installed. From my 
  readings on this group, the aircraft remains a 415c as there is no 
  paper trail of conversion to a 415cd or 415d aircraft. All the stc's 
  for the installation of the O-200 are present. 

  Unfortunately, being an extremely thorough person, he invited the 
  local FAA airworthiness inspectors to insure that they agreed the 
  aircraft was indeed a 415c. Two inspectors came to his shop to 
  examine the plane and review the paperwork. The two inspectors 
  disagreed , one inspector who is the titular LSA expert in the FAA 
  airworthiness division, believed the aircraft was indeed a 415c. The 
  other inspector, however, adamantly stated that a C-85 engine made 
  the aircraft a 415cd and that the O-200 conversion made it a D model, 
  end of debate. 

  I know that the O-200 issue has been discussed previously on this 
  site, and concensus was that the conversion did not change the 
  aircraft from a 415c. I wonder anyone in this group, especially ones 
  with experience in dealing with the FAA have any advice on achieving 
  a positive outcome in this case? Yes, I was hoping to buy the 
  airplane as an LSA. 

  Thanks for your help.

  Larry Maden



   

Reply via email to