Thanks so very much David for bringing such clarity to this issue for the 
benefit of the little people.

Cheers,
Bill


 


 

-----Original Message-----
From: David Winters <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: 'Richard Green' <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; [email protected]
Sent: Sat, 26 Jan 2008 11:45 am
Subject: RE: [ercoupe-tech] CD and D Models  LSA ELIGIBILITY....READ THIS


















  



    

            












Guys,



 



THIS IS NOT LEGAL ADVICE.  IN FACT THIS IS LEGAL UNADVICE.   (Sort of like an
UN-birthday party for Alice in Wonderland.)



 



FORGIVE ME IF I RANT A BIT.



 



We in our little closed Ercoupe society have generated a little legal world all 
our
own.  In it we have passed around
our own little legal opinions, and the more we tell them to each other, the
more we believe them.



 



We have, for example, assured each other
that we have established the metes and bounds within which the LSA 
classification is valid, or not valid,
for our lovely birds.



 



But, it
is (using technical legal terminology) a load of hooo
haaaa.



 



We, in our imaginary little legal world, are
deluding ourselves.



 



Our personal opinions of law are just personal opinions, and no more.



 



What the “plain meaning” of
the LSA rules really is can only be definitively discerned AFTER some judge
tells us what the plain meaning is, and not before.  Apparently, that has not 
yet happened.  (Even FAA opinions are not legally
binding when a judge gets hold of them.)



 



CASE IN POINT:  Many of us, apparently, have “C” registered coupes with all the 
bells
and whistles of a “D” model.  We are telling each other they are not LSA 
eligible,
cuz’ they have logbook 337 entries, have probably
been flown at 1400 lbs, etc.



 



Well, MAYBE THEY ARE ELIGIBLE AND MAYBE
THEY AIN’T.  Our little opinions
do not amount to a hill of lima beans in the world of
law.



 



For sure, whether or not somebody actually
(illegally) flew a “C” registered bird overweight, like a “D”
model, and whether that makes it LSA ineligible is NOT a question to which we
know the answer.



 



I CAN say that, as I understand to the law
books I occasionally peruse, under very well recognized rules of legal 
interpretation,
a model “C” is a model “C” is a model “C”,
whether it has been illegally overloaded or not.  (Depends upon the intent of 
the
legislators…whatever that was.) 




 



(Remember that if it is still registered
as a “C”, then any load over 1250 lb is apparently unlawful, even if it has the 
“D”
conversion installed.)



 



Under that interpretation, it apparently would
be LSA eligible.  But, I shonuff don’t know what a judge would say.  And that 
is all that counts.  There are OTHER rules of legal
interpretation besides those of intent. 
So, I can offer this merely as one possible personal opinion.



 



With respect to INSURANCE questions, I can
also say that, as I understand the law books I peruse, unless use of the bird
as an LSA materially contributes to an accident, then that LSA status is
immaterial to after-accident issues of an insurance company.  But, that is 
merely one personal
opinion, also.



 



THEREFORE, I OFFER TWO POINTS IN
CONCLUSION:



 



1.    I DO NOT KNOW EXACTLY WHICH ERCOUPES QUALIFY AS
LSA BIRDS.



2.    NOBODY ELSE KNOWS EXACTLY WHICH ERCOUPES QUALIFY AS LSA BIRDS.



 




 
Some ‘Coupes are unquestionably LSA eligible.

 
Some ‘Coupes are unquestionably NOT LSA eligible.

 
Many ‘Coupes appear to be up for grabs on the LSA question.





 



For
sure, nobody in this group can authoritatively answer the LSA eligibility
question for a model “C” ‘Coupe that has been physically
altered to make it like a model “D”, but never registered to be
legally flown as model “D”.



 



So, everybody is on
their own in this question.  We
can quote the regs on the subject ‘til the cows
come home.  But, we need to STOP
offering our legal opinions on the subject as if we know what we are talking
about, because NOBODY HERE KNOWS THE ANSWER….INCLUDING ME. 



 



In
further shortened form, 



MY PUBLICALLY
OFFERED OPINION AS AN ATTORNEY IS, “I DUNNO.”



(You may
quote me.)



 



(Yes, I
do, also, have my own personal opinion, and that opinion is….to quote
Thomas Jefferson…..”personal.”)



 



Dave (the grouch) W



 



-----Original Message-----

From: [email protected]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Richard Green

Sent: Saturday, January 26, 2008 5:51 PM

To: [email protected]

Subject: [ercoupe-tech] CD and D
Models



 












I got an FAA record return for an aircraft I hope to buy. The Coupe 

left factory as a CD in 1947. 



Only one bill of sale in late 1947 and the associated registration 

application for that same sale says D rather than CD. All other 

registrations and bills of sale (and there are numerous)say CD or 

don't note the model (early records in the 47, 48, 49 and 50's don't 

note the model in the registration cert.). 



To my knowledge W&B was not upped to 1400 pounds. All 337's in FAA 

records provided say CD model.



I am guessing this might be a killer for LSA as there is at least one 

registration way back yonder (1947) that says D. I also suspect they 

just weren't careful in the documentation because they didn't need to 

be then. 



Am I correct in my assessment that the a/c is disqualifeid for LSA 

based on this documentation? I don't think the current owner knows 

this yet. Will be calling to talk to him. Best regards.



















    
  

    
    








 


________________________________________________________________________
More new features than ever.  Check out the new AOL Mail ! - 
http://webmail.aol.com

Reply via email to